vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Goosehead Insurance, Inc. (GSHD) and Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TARS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($151.7M vs $93.1M, roughly 1.6× Goosehead Insurance, Inc.). Goosehead Insurance, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8.6% vs -5.5%, a 14.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (128.4% vs 23.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (134.4% CAGR vs 9.2%).

Goosehead Insurance is a U.S.-based personal lines insurance agency that offers a wide range of coverage products including auto, home, renters, flood, and specialty insurance. It partners with hundreds of insurance carriers to provide clients with tailored, cost-effective coverage options, operating via corporate locations and a national franchise network for independent agents.

Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a late-stage clinical biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing innovative therapeutic candidates for unmet medical needs in ophthalmology, dermatology, and other specialty care areas. It operates primarily in the United States, with lead product candidates targeting common, underdiagnosed conditions including demodex blepharitis and rosacea.

GSHD vs TARS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TARS
TARS
1.6× larger
TARS
$151.7M
$93.1M
GSHD
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TARS
TARS
+105.2% gap
TARS
128.4%
23.1%
GSHD
Higher net margin
GSHD
GSHD
14.2% more per $
GSHD
8.6%
-5.5%
TARS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TARS
TARS
Annualised
TARS
134.4%
9.2%
GSHD

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
GSHD
GSHD
TARS
TARS
Revenue
$93.1M
$151.7M
Net Profit
$8.0M
$-8.4M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
16.1%
-5.3%
Net Margin
8.6%
-5.5%
Revenue YoY
23.1%
128.4%
Net Profit YoY
204.0%
63.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.19
$-0.17

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GSHD
GSHD
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$93.1M
Q4 25
$105.3M
$151.7M
Q3 25
$90.4M
$118.7M
Q2 25
$94.0M
$102.7M
Q1 25
$75.6M
$78.3M
Q4 24
$93.9M
$66.4M
Q3 24
$78.0M
$48.1M
Q2 24
$78.1M
$40.8M
Net Profit
GSHD
GSHD
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$8.0M
Q4 25
$12.4M
$-8.4M
Q3 25
$7.9M
$-12.6M
Q2 25
$5.2M
$-20.3M
Q1 25
$2.3M
$-25.1M
Q4 24
$14.9M
$-23.1M
Q3 24
$7.6M
$-23.4M
Q2 24
$6.2M
$-33.3M
Operating Margin
GSHD
GSHD
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
16.1%
Q4 25
29.4%
-5.3%
Q3 25
23.5%
-12.2%
Q2 25
16.7%
-21.6%
Q1 25
8.8%
-33.5%
Q4 24
29.7%
-36.8%
Q3 24
21.1%
-52.3%
Q2 24
19.7%
-81.6%
Net Margin
GSHD
GSHD
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
8.6%
Q4 25
11.8%
-5.5%
Q3 25
8.7%
-10.6%
Q2 25
5.5%
-19.8%
Q1 25
3.1%
-32.1%
Q4 24
15.8%
-34.8%
Q3 24
9.7%
-48.7%
Q2 24
7.9%
-81.6%
EPS (diluted)
GSHD
GSHD
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$0.19
Q4 25
$0.48
$-0.17
Q3 25
$0.29
$-0.30
Q2 25
$0.18
$-0.48
Q1 25
$0.09
$-0.64
Q4 24
$0.58
$-0.57
Q3 24
$0.29
$-0.61
Q2 24
$0.24
$-0.88

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GSHD
GSHD
TARS
TARS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$25.7M
$417.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$72.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-121.3M
$343.4M
Total Assets
$392.8M
$562.2M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.21×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GSHD
GSHD
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$25.7M
Q4 25
$34.4M
$417.3M
Q3 25
$51.6M
$401.8M
Q2 25
$92.4M
$381.1M
Q1 25
$70.2M
$407.9M
Q4 24
$54.3M
$291.4M
Q3 24
$47.5M
$317.0M
Q2 24
$23.6M
$323.6M
Total Debt
GSHD
GSHD
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$289.5M
$72.4M
Q3 25
$290.0M
$72.3M
Q2 25
$289.8M
$72.1M
Q1 25
$290.3M
$72.0M
Q4 24
$82.3M
$71.8M
Q3 24
$84.6M
$71.7M
Q2 24
$87.0M
$71.6M
Stockholders' Equity
GSHD
GSHD
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$-121.3M
Q4 25
$-95.5M
$343.4M
Q3 25
$-105.0M
$335.1M
Q2 25
$-78.6M
$332.6M
Q1 25
$-88.5M
$342.5M
Q4 24
$43.9M
$224.5M
Q3 24
$58.3M
$237.5M
Q2 24
$39.8M
$252.2M
Total Assets
GSHD
GSHD
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$392.8M
Q4 25
$414.9M
$562.2M
Q3 25
$403.6M
$534.6M
Q2 25
$436.6M
$495.0M
Q1 25
$412.6M
$500.8M
Q4 24
$397.7M
$377.0M
Q3 24
$358.1M
$376.3M
Q2 24
$338.2M
$376.8M
Debt / Equity
GSHD
GSHD
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.21×
Q3 25
0.22×
Q2 25
0.22×
Q1 25
0.21×
Q4 24
1.87×
0.32×
Q3 24
1.45×
0.30×
Q2 24
2.19×
0.28×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GSHD
GSHD
TARS
TARS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$19.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$13.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
8.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-22.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GSHD
GSHD
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$91.8M
$19.3M
Q3 25
$24.2M
$18.3M
Q2 25
$28.9M
$-29.4M
Q1 25
$15.5M
$-20.7M
Q4 24
$71.5M
$-22.2M
Q3 24
$28.1M
$-8.7M
Q2 24
$18.9M
$-14.4M
Free Cash Flow
GSHD
GSHD
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$86.1M
$13.0M
Q3 25
$23.7M
$16.3M
Q2 25
$27.2M
$-30.4M
Q1 25
$14.9M
$-21.2M
Q4 24
$70.6M
$-22.3M
Q3 24
$28.0M
$-8.9M
Q2 24
$18.6M
$-15.4M
FCF Margin
GSHD
GSHD
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
Q4 25
81.8%
8.6%
Q3 25
26.2%
13.8%
Q2 25
28.9%
-29.6%
Q1 25
19.7%
-27.1%
Q4 24
75.1%
-33.5%
Q3 24
35.9%
-18.6%
Q2 24
23.9%
-37.8%
Capex Intensity
GSHD
GSHD
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.4%
4.2%
Q3 25
0.5%
1.6%
Q2 25
1.8%
1.0%
Q1 25
0.8%
0.8%
Q4 24
1.0%
0.1%
Q3 24
0.1%
0.6%
Q2 24
0.3%
2.5%
Cash Conversion
GSHD
GSHD
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
Q4 25
7.38×
Q3 25
3.06×
Q2 25
5.61×
Q1 25
6.61×
Q4 24
4.82×
Q3 24
3.72×
Q2 24
3.05×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GSHD
GSHD

Renewal Royalty Fees (2)$43.6M47%
Renewal Commissions (1)$18.2M20%
Contingent Commissions (1)$10.7M11%
New Business Royalty Fees (2)$7.9M8%
New Business Commissions (1)$7.5M8%
Other$3.7M4%
Initial Franchise Fees (2)$1.6M2%

TARS
TARS

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons