vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (GT) and TELUS CORP (TU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.9B vs $3.7B, roughly 1.3× TELUS CORP). GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO runs the higher net margin — 2.1% vs -4.8%, a 7.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TELUS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.2% vs -0.6%).

Cooper Tire & Rubber Company is an American company that specializes in the design, manufacture, marketing, and sales of replacement automobile and truck tires, and has subsidiaries that specialize in medium truck, motorcycle, and racing tires. With headquarters in Findlay, Ohio, Cooper Tire has 60 manufacturing, sales, distribution, technical, and design facilities within its worldwide family of subsidiary companies, including the UK-based Avon Tyres brand, which produces tires for motorcycl...

Telus Corporation is a Canadian publicly traded holding company and conglomerate, headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, which is the parent company of several subsidiaries: Telus Communications offers telephony, television, data and Internet services; Telus Mobility offers wireless services; Telus Health operates companies that provide health products and services; and Telus Digital operates worldwide, providing multilingual customer service outsourcing and digital IT services. Telus ...

GT vs TU — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GT
GT
1.3× larger
GT
$4.9B
$3.7B
TU
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TU
TU
+2.8% gap
TU
2.2%
-0.6%
GT
Higher net margin
GT
GT
7.0% more per $
GT
2.1%
-4.8%
TU

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025

Metric
GT
GT
TU
TU
Revenue
$4.9B
$3.7B
Net Profit
$105.0M
$-178.8M
Gross Margin
20.9%
90.2%
Operating Margin
3.3%
3.4%
Net Margin
2.1%
-4.8%
Revenue YoY
-0.6%
2.2%
Net Profit YoY
43.8%
-210.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.36

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GT
GT
TU
TU
Q4 25
$4.9B
Q3 25
$4.6B
Q2 25
$4.5B
$3.7B
Q1 25
$4.3B
Q4 24
$4.9B
Q3 24
$4.8B
Q2 24
$4.6B
$3.6B
Q1 24
$4.5B
Net Profit
GT
GT
TU
TU
Q4 25
$105.0M
Q3 25
$-2.2B
Q2 25
$254.0M
$-178.8M
Q1 25
$115.0M
Q4 24
$73.0M
Q3 24
$-37.0M
Q2 24
$79.0M
$161.3M
Q1 24
$-69.0M
Gross Margin
GT
GT
TU
TU
Q4 25
20.9%
Q3 25
18.2%
Q2 25
17.0%
90.2%
Q1 25
17.4%
Q4 24
19.9%
Q3 24
19.5%
Q2 24
20.6%
87.9%
Q1 24
18.0%
Operating Margin
GT
GT
TU
TU
Q4 25
3.3%
Q3 25
-15.8%
Q2 25
6.8%
3.4%
Q1 25
3.1%
Q4 24
1.5%
Q3 24
-0.6%
Q2 24
2.9%
13.7%
Q1 24
-1.1%
Net Margin
GT
GT
TU
TU
Q4 25
2.1%
Q3 25
-47.3%
Q2 25
5.7%
-4.8%
Q1 25
2.7%
Q4 24
1.5%
Q3 24
-0.8%
Q2 24
1.7%
4.4%
Q1 24
-1.5%
EPS (diluted)
GT
GT
TU
TU
Q4 25
$0.36
Q3 25
$-7.62
Q2 25
$0.87
Q1 25
$0.40
Q4 24
$0.25
Q3 24
$-0.13
Q2 24
$0.28
Q1 24
$-0.24

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GT
GT
TU
TU
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$801.0M
$2.7B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$5.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.2B
$11.8B
Total Assets
$18.2B
$44.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.65×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GT
GT
TU
TU
Q4 25
$801.0M
Q3 25
$810.0M
Q2 25
$785.0M
$2.7B
Q1 25
$902.0M
Q4 24
$810.0M
Q3 24
$905.0M
Q2 24
$789.0M
$676.7M
Q1 24
$893.0M
Total Debt
GT
GT
TU
TU
Q4 25
$5.3B
Q3 25
$7.3B
Q2 25
$6.6B
Q1 25
$7.3B
Q4 24
$6.4B
Q3 24
$7.4B
Q2 24
$6.8B
Q1 24
$7.5B
Stockholders' Equity
GT
GT
TU
TU
Q4 25
$3.2B
Q3 25
$3.0B
Q2 25
$5.1B
$11.8B
Q1 25
$4.9B
Q4 24
$4.7B
Q3 24
$4.7B
Q2 24
$4.7B
$12.4B
Q1 24
$4.6B
Total Assets
GT
GT
TU
TU
Q4 25
$18.2B
Q3 25
$20.2B
Q2 25
$22.3B
$44.3B
Q1 25
$21.7B
Q4 24
$20.9B
Q3 24
$22.5B
Q2 24
$22.0B
$41.8B
Q1 24
$22.0B
Debt / Equity
GT
GT
TU
TU
Q4 25
1.65×
Q3 25
2.42×
Q2 25
1.28×
Q1 25
1.48×
Q4 24
1.37×
Q3 24
1.57×
Q2 24
1.45×
Q1 24
1.61×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GT
GT
TU
TU
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.5B
$851.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$1.3B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
27.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
14.40×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-30.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GT
GT
TU
TU
Q4 25
$1.5B
Q3 25
$2.0M
Q2 25
$-180.0M
$851.2M
Q1 25
$-538.0M
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$-73.0M
Q2 24
$-67.0M
$1.0B
Q1 24
$-451.0M
Free Cash Flow
GT
GT
TU
TU
Q4 25
$1.3B
Q3 25
$-181.0M
Q2 25
$-387.0M
Q1 25
$-797.0M
Q4 24
$1.0B
Q3 24
$-351.0M
Q2 24
$-383.0M
Q1 24
$-769.0M
FCF Margin
GT
GT
TU
TU
Q4 25
27.2%
Q3 25
-3.9%
Q2 25
-8.7%
Q1 25
-18.7%
Q4 24
20.5%
Q3 24
-7.3%
Q2 24
-8.4%
Q1 24
-16.9%
Capex Intensity
GT
GT
TU
TU
Q4 25
3.6%
Q3 25
3.9%
Q2 25
4.6%
Q1 25
6.1%
Q4 24
5.6%
Q3 24
5.8%
Q2 24
6.9%
Q1 24
7.0%
Cash Conversion
GT
GT
TU
TU
Q4 25
14.40×
Q3 25
Q2 25
-0.71×
Q1 25
-4.68×
Q4 24
17.66×
Q3 24
Q2 24
-0.85×
6.28×
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GT
GT

Tire Unit Sales$2.4B50%
Other$2.3B46%
Other Tireand Related Sales$192.0M4%

TU
TU

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons