vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (GT) and Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.9B vs $2.6B, roughly 1.9× Vertiv Holdings Co). Vertiv Holdings Co runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs 2.1%, a 12.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vertiv Holdings Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.1% vs -0.6%). GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.3B vs $652.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Vertiv Holdings Co's revenue compounded faster (16.5% CAGR vs 4.1%).

Cooper Tire & Rubber Company is an American company that specializes in the design, manufacture, marketing, and sales of replacement automobile and truck tires, and has subsidiaries that specialize in medium truck, motorcycle, and racing tires. With headquarters in Findlay, Ohio, Cooper Tire has 60 manufacturing, sales, distribution, technical, and design facilities within its worldwide family of subsidiary companies, including the UK-based Avon Tyres brand, which produces tires for motorcycl...

Vertiv is an American multinational provider of critical infrastructure and services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments.

GT vs VRT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GT
GT
1.9× larger
GT
$4.9B
$2.6B
VRT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
VRT
VRT
+30.7% gap
VRT
30.1%
-0.6%
GT
Higher net margin
VRT
VRT
12.6% more per $
VRT
14.7%
2.1%
GT
More free cash flow
GT
GT
$682.2M more FCF
GT
$1.3B
$652.8M
VRT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
VRT
VRT
Annualised
VRT
16.5%
4.1%
GT

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Revenue
$4.9B
$2.6B
Net Profit
$105.0M
$390.1M
Gross Margin
20.9%
37.7%
Operating Margin
3.3%
Net Margin
2.1%
14.7%
Revenue YoY
-0.6%
30.1%
Net Profit YoY
43.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.36
$0.99

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$2.6B
Q4 25
$4.9B
$2.9B
Q3 25
$4.6B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$4.5B
$2.6B
Q1 25
$4.3B
$2.0B
Q4 24
$4.9B
$2.3B
Q3 24
$4.8B
$2.1B
Q2 24
$4.6B
$2.0B
Net Profit
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$390.1M
Q4 25
$105.0M
$445.6M
Q3 25
$-2.2B
$398.5M
Q2 25
$254.0M
$324.2M
Q1 25
$115.0M
$164.5M
Q4 24
$73.0M
$147.0M
Q3 24
$-37.0M
$176.6M
Q2 24
$79.0M
$178.1M
Gross Margin
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
37.7%
Q4 25
20.9%
38.9%
Q3 25
18.2%
37.8%
Q2 25
17.0%
34.0%
Q1 25
17.4%
33.7%
Q4 24
19.9%
37.1%
Q3 24
19.5%
36.5%
Q2 24
20.6%
38.0%
Operating Margin
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.3%
20.1%
Q3 25
-15.8%
19.3%
Q2 25
6.8%
16.8%
Q1 25
3.1%
14.3%
Q4 24
1.5%
19.5%
Q3 24
-0.6%
17.9%
Q2 24
2.9%
17.2%
Net Margin
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
14.7%
Q4 25
2.1%
15.5%
Q3 25
-47.3%
14.9%
Q2 25
5.7%
12.3%
Q1 25
2.7%
8.1%
Q4 24
1.5%
6.3%
Q3 24
-0.8%
8.5%
Q2 24
1.7%
9.1%
EPS (diluted)
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$0.99
Q4 25
$0.36
$1.14
Q3 25
$-7.62
$1.02
Q2 25
$0.87
$0.83
Q1 25
$0.40
$0.42
Q4 24
$0.25
$0.38
Q3 24
$-0.13
$0.46
Q2 24
$0.28
$0.46

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$801.0M
$2.5B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$5.3B
$0
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.2B
$4.2B
Total Assets
$18.2B
$13.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.65×
0.00×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$2.5B
Q4 25
$801.0M
$1.7B
Q3 25
$810.0M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$785.0M
$1.6B
Q1 25
$902.0M
$1.5B
Q4 24
$810.0M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$905.0M
$908.7M
Q2 24
$789.0M
$579.7M
Total Debt
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$0
Q4 25
$5.3B
$2.9B
Q3 25
$7.3B
$2.9B
Q2 25
$6.6B
$2.9B
Q1 25
$7.3B
$2.9B
Q4 24
$6.4B
$2.9B
Q3 24
$7.4B
$2.9B
Q2 24
$6.8B
$2.9B
Stockholders' Equity
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$4.2B
Q4 25
$3.2B
$3.9B
Q3 25
$3.0B
$3.5B
Q2 25
$5.1B
$3.1B
Q1 25
$4.9B
$2.7B
Q4 24
$4.7B
$2.4B
Q3 24
$4.7B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$4.7B
$1.5B
Total Assets
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$13.4B
Q4 25
$18.2B
$12.2B
Q3 25
$20.2B
$10.8B
Q2 25
$22.3B
$10.4B
Q1 25
$21.7B
$9.5B
Q4 24
$20.9B
$9.1B
Q3 24
$22.5B
$8.9B
Q2 24
$22.0B
$8.1B
Debt / Equity
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
0.00×
Q4 25
1.65×
0.74×
Q3 25
2.42×
0.83×
Q2 25
1.28×
0.93×
Q1 25
1.48×
1.10×
Q4 24
1.37×
1.20×
Q3 24
1.57×
1.62×
Q2 24
1.45×
1.91×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.5B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$1.3B
$652.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
27.2%
24.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.6%
4.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
14.40×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-30.0M
$2.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.5B
$978.9M
Q3 25
$2.0M
$508.7M
Q2 25
$-180.0M
$322.9M
Q1 25
$-538.0M
$303.3M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$425.2M
Q3 24
$-73.0M
$378.2M
Q2 24
$-67.0M
$378.4M
Free Cash Flow
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$652.8M
Q4 25
$1.3B
$885.6M
Q3 25
$-181.0M
$463.5M
Q2 25
$-387.0M
$277.9M
Q1 25
$-797.0M
$266.8M
Q4 24
$1.0B
$364.5M
Q3 24
$-351.0M
$341.8M
Q2 24
$-383.0M
$344.3M
FCF Margin
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
24.6%
Q4 25
27.2%
30.8%
Q3 25
-3.9%
17.3%
Q2 25
-8.7%
10.5%
Q1 25
-18.7%
13.1%
Q4 24
20.5%
15.5%
Q3 24
-7.3%
16.5%
Q2 24
-8.4%
17.6%
Capex Intensity
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
4.2%
Q4 25
3.6%
3.2%
Q3 25
3.9%
1.7%
Q2 25
4.6%
1.7%
Q1 25
6.1%
1.8%
Q4 24
5.6%
2.6%
Q3 24
5.8%
1.8%
Q2 24
6.9%
1.7%
Cash Conversion
GT
GT
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
14.40×
2.20×
Q3 25
1.28×
Q2 25
-0.71×
1.00×
Q1 25
-4.68×
1.84×
Q4 24
17.66×
2.89×
Q3 24
2.14×
Q2 24
-0.85×
2.12×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GT
GT

Tire Unit Sales$2.4B50%
Other$2.3B46%
Other Tireand Related Sales$192.0M4%

VRT
VRT

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons