vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM) and LandBridge Co LLC (LB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LandBridge Co LLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($56.8M vs $32.7M, roughly 1.7× Good Times Restaurants Inc.). LandBridge Co LLC runs the higher net margin — 14.2% vs 0.6%, a 13.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LandBridge Co LLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (55.6% vs -10.0%). LandBridge Co LLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($122.0M vs $1.2M). Over the past eight quarters, LandBridge Co LLC's revenue compounded faster (72.8% CAGR vs -0.7%).
Good Times is a Golden, Colorado–based fast-food restaurant specializing in premium burgers and frozen custard. As of July 2023, the chain operates 31 locations, down from 38 in 2015.
GTIM vs LB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.7M | $56.8M |
| Net Profit | $181.0K | $8.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | 60.0% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 14.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | 55.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | -83.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.7M | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.0M | $50.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.3M | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.3M | $36.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.8M | $28.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.4M | $19.0M |
| Q4 25 | $181.0K | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-624.0K | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.0K | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.0K | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $-57.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $618.0K | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 60.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.5% | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 57.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 49.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | -197.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 71.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 135.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | -222.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 56.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.14 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $30.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $570.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.2M | $340.3M |
| Total Assets | $82.5M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.68× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $570.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $366.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $370.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $375.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $385.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $360.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $33.2M | $340.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.1M | $272.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.6M | $266.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $217.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.4M | $211.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.4M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | $296.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.6M | $162.3M |
| Q4 25 | $82.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.1M | $689.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.1M | $710.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $89.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.4M | $126.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.2M | $122.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.8% | 214.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 7.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.85× | 15.68× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-72.0K | $207.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $126.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $34.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $714.0K | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-518.0K | $67.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.0K | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $17.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $122.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $735.0K | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-105.0K | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $66.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-466.0K | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2M | $17.1M |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 214.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 66.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.3% | 75.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.3% | 182.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.3% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 60.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | 90.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 7.85× | 15.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.85× | 4.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.16× | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.71× | 2.80× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.44× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.86× | 1.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
