vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM) and Orange County Bancorp, Inc. (OBT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($33.0M vs $32.7M, roughly 1.0× Good Times Restaurants Inc.). Orange County Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 37.6% vs 0.6%, a 37.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Orange County Bancorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.6% vs -10.0%). Orange County Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($41.3M vs $1.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Orange County Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (14.3% CAGR vs -0.7%).
Good Times is a Golden, Colorado–based fast-food restaurant specializing in premium burgers and frozen custard. As of July 2023, the chain operates 31 locations, down from 38 in 2015.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc. is a Delaware-registered bank holding company operating mainly in New York, U.S. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services, including deposit accounts, loans and wealth management solutions, serving individual consumers, small and mid-sized corporate clients in its regional footprint.
GTIM vs OBT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.7M | $33.0M |
| Net Profit | $181.0K | $12.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | 41.4% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 37.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | 20.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | 73.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.7M | $33.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.0M | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.3M | $32.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.3M | $27.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.8M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.4M | $25.3M |
| Q4 25 | $181.0K | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-624.0K | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.0K | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.0K | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $618.0K | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.5% | 41.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 40.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 32.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 36.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 45.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | 29.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.14 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $0.64 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.73 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $0.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.2M | $284.4M |
| Total Assets | $82.5M | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $33.2M | $284.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.1M | $270.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.6M | $252.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $201.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.4M | $185.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.4M | $193.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.6M | $168.7M |
| Q4 25 | $82.5M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.8M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.9M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.5M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.1M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.1M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $89.0M | $2.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.4M | $43.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.2M | $41.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.8% | 125.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 7.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.85× | 3.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-72.0K | $69.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $714.0K | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-518.0K | $34.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.0K | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $41.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $735.0K | $29.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-105.0K | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $32.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-466.0K | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 125.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 87.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.3% | -17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.3% | 120.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.3% | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 32.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | 7.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 7.85× | 3.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.85× | 3.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.16× | 4.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.71× | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.44× | 1.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.86× | 0.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
