vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS) and Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $624.4M, roughly 1.7× Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.). CHART INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs 1.0%, a 4.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CHART INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.5% vs -33.2%). Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($348.6M vs $66.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (91.0% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc., formerly the Howard Hughes Corporation, is a real estate development and management company based in The Woodlands, Texas. It was formed in 2010 as a spin-off from General Growth Properties (GGP). Most of its holdings are focused on several master-planned communities. It took its name from the original Howard Hughes Corporation, which had developed the planned community of Summerlin, Nevada, and later became a subsidiary of GGP.
GTLS vs HHH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $624.4M |
| Net Profit | $53.6M | $6.0M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 4.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 1.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | -33.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.7% | -96.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | $0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $624.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $390.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $260.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $935.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $327.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $317.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $950.7M | $171.1M |
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-138.5M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.1M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5M | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | $156.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $72.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.6M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3M | $-52.5M |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | -9.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.6% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | -4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | -30.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.23 | $2.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.53 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.57 | $3.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $1.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.10 | $-1.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $366.0M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $3.8B |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $10.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.13× | 1.35× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $366.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.2M | $493.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.6M | $596.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.2M | $400.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $247.4M | $436.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.9M | $462.7M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $2.9B |
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $10.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $10.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $9.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.2B | $9.6B |
| Q4 25 | 1.13× | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $88.8M | $360.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.2M | $348.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | 55.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | 60.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $202.8M | $417.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $88.8M | $360.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $149.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.9M | $177.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.0M | $-224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.4M | $337.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.6M | $248.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.1M | $-17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-95.1M | $-171.2M |
| Q4 25 | $66.2M | $348.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.0M | $169.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.1M | $-238.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | $317.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.5M | $238.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-141.2M | $-182.0M |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | 35.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 65.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | -119.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | 73.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | -106.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | 6.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | 60.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.21× | -21.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | 3.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | -0.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.42× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
HHH
| Transferred At Point In Time | $499.8M | 80% |
| Operating Assets Segment | $117.9M | 19% |
| Builder Price Participation | $12.9M | 2% |
