vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS) and JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC (JHG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.1× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC runs the higher net margin — 35.3% vs 5.0%, a 30.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (61.3% vs -2.5%). JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($320.4M vs $66.2M). Over the past eight quarters, JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC's revenue compounded faster (43.9% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
Janus Henderson is a British-American global asset management group headquartered in the City of London, United Kingdom. It offers a range of financial products to individuals, intermediary advisors, and institutional investors globally under the trade name Janus Henderson Investors.
GTLS vs JHG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $53.6M | $403.2M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 42.7% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 35.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 61.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.7% | 231.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | $2.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $700.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $633.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $621.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $708.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $624.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $588.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $950.7M | $551.7M |
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | $403.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-138.5M | $142.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.1M | $149.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5M | $120.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | $121.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.6M | $129.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3M | $130.1M |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | 42.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 24.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 26.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | 21.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 35.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.6% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 22.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | 23.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | $2.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.23 | $0.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.53 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.57 | $0.77 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.10 | $0.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $366.0M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $5.1B |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $8.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.13× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $366.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $247.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.9M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $4.4B |
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $7.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.2B | $6.3B |
| Q4 25 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $88.8M | $322.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.2M | $320.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | 28.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | 0.80× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $202.8M | $710.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $88.8M | $322.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $258.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.9M | $135.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.0M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.4M | $247.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.6M | $228.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.1M | $223.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-95.1M | $-5.0M |
| Q4 25 | $66.2M | $320.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $256.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.0M | $133.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.1M | $900.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | $243.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.5M | $225.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | $221.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-141.2M | $-6.8M |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | 34.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | 36.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | 0.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.21× | 0.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 2.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | 8.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | 1.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.42× | -0.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
JHG
| Investment Advice | $585.2M | 51% |
| Investment Performance | $425.8M | 37% |
| Other | $76.4M | 7% |
