vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS) and North American Construction Group Ltd. (NOA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $860.2M, roughly 1.3× North American Construction Group Ltd.). CHART INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs 4.7%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, North American Construction Group Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (58.0% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
Shanghai Construction (Group) Corporation (SCG) is a Chinese construction and engineering company, ranked as the 16th largest construction company in the world based on 2011 revenues.
GTLS vs NOA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $860.2M |
| Net Profit | $53.6M | $40.5M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | 19.7% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 15.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 4.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $860.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $573.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $297.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $636.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $439.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $950.7M | $244.3M |
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-138.5M | $40.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.1M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5M | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $45.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.6M | $34.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3M | $21.8M |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.1% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.8% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.8% | 16.8% |
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | 10.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.23 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.53 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.57 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.10 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $366.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | — |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.13× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $366.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $247.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.2B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $88.8M | $140.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | 3.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $202.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $88.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $140.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.9M | $85.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.0M | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.6M | $109.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.1M | $72.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-95.1M | $31.8M |
| Q4 25 | $66.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-141.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | 3.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.21× | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.42× | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
NOA
Segment breakdown not available.
