vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS) and Natera, Inc. (NTRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $665.5M, roughly 1.6× Natera, Inc.). Natera, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.1% vs 5.0%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Natera, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (39.8% vs -2.5%). CHART INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($66.2M vs $37.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Natera, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (34.5% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
Natera, Inc. is a clinical genetic testing company based in Austin, Texas that specializes in non-invasive, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing technology, with a focus on women’s health, cancer, and organ health. Natera’s proprietary technology combines novel molecular biology techniques with a suite of bioinformatics software that allows detection down to a single molecule in a tube of blood. Natera operates CAP-accredited laboratories certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment...
GTLS vs NTRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $665.5M |
| Net Profit | $53.6M | $47.3M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | -3.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 39.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.7% | 187.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $665.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $592.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $546.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $501.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $476.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $439.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $413.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $950.7M | $367.7M |
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | $47.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-138.5M | $-87.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.1M | $-100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5M | $-66.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | $-53.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $-31.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.6M | $-37.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3M | $-67.6M |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | -20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | -13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | -20.2% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.6% | -14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | -18.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | -13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | -11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | -7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | -9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | -18.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.23 | $-0.64 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.53 | $-0.74 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.57 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.10 | $-0.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $366.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.13× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $366.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.2M | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.2M | $17.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.6M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.2M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $247.4M | $90.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.9M | $69.1M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $878.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $836.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $794.1M |
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.2B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $88.8M | $73.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.2M | $37.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | 5.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 5.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | 1.56× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $202.8M | $109.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $88.8M | $73.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $59.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.9M | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.0M | $44.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.4M | $52.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.6M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.1M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-95.1M | $27.0M |
| Q4 25 | $66.2M | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.0M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.1M | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | $34.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.5M | $35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-141.2M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.42× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
NTRA
Segment breakdown not available.
