vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS) and Principal Financial Group (PFG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $750.8M, roughly 1.4× Principal Financial Group). CHART INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs 0.3%, a 4.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Principal Financial Group posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, CHART INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs -58.3%).
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
Principal Financial GroupPFGEarnings & Financial Report
Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) is an American global financial investment management and insurance company headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa, United States.
GTLS vs PFG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $750.8M |
| Net Profit | $53.6M | $1.9M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.7% | 783.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $750.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $4.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | $517.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-138.5M | $213.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.1M | $406.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5M | $48.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | $905.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $-220.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.6M | $353.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.6% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 8.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | $2.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.23 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.53 | $1.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.57 | $3.92 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $-0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $1.49 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $366.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | — |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.13× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $366.0M | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.2M | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.3M | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.2M | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.6M | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.2M | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $247.4M | $4.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $11.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $11.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $11.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $11.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $11.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $11.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $341.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $334.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $323.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $313.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $313.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $322.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $308.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.13× | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | 0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $88.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $202.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $88.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.9M | $811.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.0M | $977.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.1M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $66.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | 3.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | 2.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.21× | 20.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 1.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | 4.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
PFG
Segment breakdown not available.
