vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS) and RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (REZI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.8× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 7.2% vs 5.0%, a 2.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.0% vs -2.5%). RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($262.0M vs $66.2M). Over the past eight quarters, RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (12.9% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
Resideo Technologies, Inc. is an American multinational company that was formed in 2018 out of a spin-off from Honeywell. It provides room air temperature, quality, and humidity control and security systems primarily in residential dwellings in the U.S. and internationally. The company operates in two segments: products and distribution. It manufactures and distributes smart-home and software products, including temperature and lighting control, security, and water and air monitoring. The com...
GTLS vs REZI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $53.6M | $136.0M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | 29.6% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 7.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 7.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.7% | 491.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | $0.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $950.7M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-138.5M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.1M | $-825.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.6M | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3M | $43.0M |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | 29.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | 29.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | 28.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.1% | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.8% | 28.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.8% | 26.9% |
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | -42.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | $0.99 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.23 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.53 | $-5.59 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.57 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.10 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $366.0M | $661.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | $3.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $8.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.13× | 1.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $366.0M | $661.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.2M | $345.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.3M | $753.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.2M | $577.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.6M | $692.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.2M | $531.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $247.4M | $413.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.9M | $603.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $8.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $8.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.2B | $6.5B |
| Q4 25 | 1.13× | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.51× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $88.8M | $299.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.2M | $262.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | 13.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | 2.20× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $202.8M | $-1.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $88.8M | $299.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $-1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.9M | $200.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.0M | $-65.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.4M | $203.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.6M | $147.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.1M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-95.1M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $66.2M | $262.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $-1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.0M | $180.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.1M | $-96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | $181.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.5M | $125.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | $77.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-141.2M | $-19.0M |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | -85.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | -1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | 2.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -10.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.21× | -10.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 8.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | 7.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | 3.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.42× | 0.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
REZI
| ADI Global Distribution Segment | $1.2B | 62% |
| Safety And Security | $257.0M | 14% |
| Air | $211.0M | 11% |
| Energy Service | $153.0M | 8% |
| Public Utilities Inventory Water | $91.0M | 5% |
