vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS) and Trade Desk (The) (TTD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $688.9M, roughly 1.6× Trade Desk (The)). Trade Desk (The) runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs 5.0%, a 0.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Trade Desk (The) posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Trade Desk (The)'s revenue compounded faster (8.6% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
The Trade Desk, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that specializes in real-time programmatic marketing automation technologies, products, and services, designed to personalize digital content delivery to users.
GTLS vs TTD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $688.9M |
| Net Profit | $53.6M | $40.0M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.7% | -21.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | $0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $688.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $846.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $739.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $694.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $616.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $741.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $628.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $584.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | $186.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-138.5M | $115.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.1M | $90.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5M | $50.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | $182.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $94.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.6M | $85.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | 80.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | 78.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | 78.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | 76.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | 81.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.1% | 80.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.8% | 81.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 16.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.6% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 14.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.23 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.53 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.57 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $366.0M | $878.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $2.5B |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $5.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.13× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $878.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $366.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.6M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $247.4M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $6.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $5.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $88.8M | $391.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | 9.80× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $202.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $391.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $88.8M | $311.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $224.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.9M | $165.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.0M | $291.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.4M | $199.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.6M | $273.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.1M | $81.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $66.2M | $285.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $158.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.0M | $119.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.1M | $232.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | $179.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.5M | $224.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | $59.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | 37.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 10.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.80× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | 1.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.94× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | 1.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.21× | 5.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | 2.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | 0.96× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
TTD
Segment breakdown not available.
