vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS) and Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $969.9M, roughly 1.1× Virtu Financial, Inc.). Virtu Financial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 14.4% vs 5.0%, a 9.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Virtu Financial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.3% vs -2.5%). Virtu Financial, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($495.6M vs $66.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Virtu Financial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.8% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
Virtu Financial, Inc. is an American high-frequency trading company. The company went public on the Nasdaq in 2015.
GTLS vs VIRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $969.9M |
| Net Profit | $53.6M | $139.9M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 35.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 14.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 16.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.7% | 48.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | $1.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $969.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $824.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $999.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $837.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $834.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $706.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $693.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $950.7M | $642.8M |
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | $139.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-138.5M | $77.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.1M | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5M | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | $94.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.6M | $66.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3M | $55.8M |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | 35.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | 34.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | 21.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.6% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | 8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | $1.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.23 | $0.86 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.53 | $1.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $1.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.57 | $1.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $0.64 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $0.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.10 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $366.0M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | $2.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $20.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.13× | 1.29× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $366.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.2M | $707.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.3M | $752.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.2M | $723.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.6M | $872.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.2M | $701.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $247.4M | $684.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.9M | $399.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $20.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $21.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $19.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $17.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $14.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $13.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.2B | $12.8B |
| Q4 25 | 1.13× | 1.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | 1.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.42× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $88.8M | $518.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.2M | $495.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | 51.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | 3.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $202.8M | $485.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $88.8M | $518.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $-68.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.9M | $62.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.0M | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.4M | $599.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.6M | $112.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.1M | $490.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-95.1M | $-395.4M |
| Q4 25 | $66.2M | $495.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $-76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.0M | $57.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.1M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | $586.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.5M | $106.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | $486.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-141.2M | $-398.2M |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 51.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | -9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | 70.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 70.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | -61.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | 3.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | 0.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.21× | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 6.37× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | 7.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.42× | -7.08× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
VIRT
Segment breakdown not available.