vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $677.3M, roughly 1.6× WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs 5.0%, a 9.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs -2.5%). CHART INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($66.2M vs $6.6M). Over the past eight quarters, CHART INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
GTLS vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $677.3M |
| Net Profit | $53.6M | $99.6M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | 48.1% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 19.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 14.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 21.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.7% | 34.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | $2.97 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $677.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $597.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $99.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-138.5M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.1M | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5M | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.6M | $82.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.1% | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.8% | 47.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 18.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 13.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.97 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.23 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.53 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.57 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $2.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $366.0M | $374.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | $197.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.13× | 0.09× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $374.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $366.0M | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.2M | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.3M | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.2M | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.6M | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.2M | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $247.4M | $279.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $197.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $88.8M | $17.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.2M | $6.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | 1.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | 0.18× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $202.8M | $317.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $17.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $88.8M | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.9M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.0M | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.4M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.6M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.1M | $85.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $66.2M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.0M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.1M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.5M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | $78.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.21× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | 1.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
WTS
| segment net | $517.8M | 76% |
| Other | $159.5M | 24% |
