vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and Loews Corporation (L). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Garrett Motion Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($985.0M vs $827.0M, roughly 1.2× Loews Corporation). Loews Corporation runs the higher net margin — 48.6% vs 9.6%, a 39.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Garrett Motion Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.2% vs 4.8%). Loews Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($426.0M vs $49.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Loews Corporation's revenue compounded faster (7.9% CAGR vs 5.2%).
Garrett Motion Inc., formerly Honeywell Transportation Systems and Honeywell Turbo Technologies, is an American company primarily involved in engineering, development and manufacturing of turbochargers and related forced induction systems for ground vehicles from small passenger cars to large trucks and industrial equipment and construction machinery. It originated as part of Garrett AiResearch's Industrial Division in Phoenix, Arizona, in 1954, after which they entered a contract to provide ...
Loews Corporation is a diversified US-based conglomerate that operates across multiple key industry segments through its subsidiaries. Its core business lines include property and casualty insurance, natural gas pipeline transportation, hospitality services, and upstream oil and gas exploration and production, primarily serving commercial, consumer and industrial clients across North American markets.
GTX vs L — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $985.0M | $827.0M |
| Net Profit | $95.0M | $402.0M |
| Gross Margin | 19.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 65.4% |
| Net Margin | 9.6% | 48.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.2% | 4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 53.2% | 115.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.93 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $985.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $891.0M | $827.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $902.0M | $732.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $913.0M | $769.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $878.0M | $846.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.0M | $789.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $826.0M | $683.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $890.0M | $711.0M |
| Q1 26 | $95.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $84.0M | $402.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.0M | $504.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.0M | $391.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.0M | $370.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $187.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.0M | $401.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.0M | $369.0M |
| Q1 26 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | 65.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.3% | 94.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 70.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | 60.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 23.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.2% | 80.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 71.3% |
| Q1 26 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.4% | 48.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | 43.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.8% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 58.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 51.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.42 | $1.93 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.38 | $2.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.42 | $1.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $1.74 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.46 | $0.87 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.24 | $1.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $1.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $142.0M | $6.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.4B | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $18.7B |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $86.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.45× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $142.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $177.0M | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $230.0M | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $232.0M | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.0M | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $125.0M | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.0M | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.0M | $4.9B |
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-802.0M | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-813.0M | $18.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-812.0M | $17.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-700.0M | $17.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-673.0M | $17.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-778.0M | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-725.0M | $16.4B |
| Q1 26 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $86.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $85.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $84.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $83.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $81.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $83.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $81.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.52× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $98.0M | $617.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $49.0M | $426.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.0% | 51.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 23.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.03× | 1.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $360.0M | $2.7B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $98.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.0M | $617.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.0M | $920.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $158.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.0M | $736.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $131.0M | $941.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.0M | $934.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.0M | $952.0M |
| Q1 26 | $49.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $78.0M | $426.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.0M | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $872.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0M | $638.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.0M | $767.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $794.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.0M | $793.0M |
| Q1 26 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 51.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 104.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | 113.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 75.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | 97.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | 116.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | 111.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 22.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.18× | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.30× | 1.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.82× | 2.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | 1.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.31× | 5.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.29× | 2.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.97× | 2.58× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTX
Segment breakdown not available.
L
| Transportation And Storage Of Natural Gas And NG Ls And Ethane Supply And Transportation Services | $601.0M | 73% |
| Lodging And Related Services | $226.0M | 27% |
