vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GULF RESOURCES, INC. (GURE) and Lakeside Holding Ltd (LSH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

GULF RESOURCES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.0M vs $7.0M, roughly 1.3× Lakeside Holding Ltd). Lakeside Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — -22.6% vs -394.3%, a 371.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GULF RESOURCES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (303.4% vs 95.0%).

EOG Resources, Inc. is an American energy company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in the Heritage Plaza building in Houston, Texas.

Lakeside Press was a Chicago publishing imprint under which the RR Donnelley Company produced fine books as well as mail order catalogs, telephone directories, encyclopedias, and advertising. The Press was best known for its high quality editions for the Chicago Caxton Club as well as the Lakeside Classics, a series of fine reprints.

GURE vs LSH — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GURE
GURE
1.3× larger
GURE
$9.0M
$7.0M
LSH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GURE
GURE
+208.3% gap
GURE
303.4%
95.0%
LSH
Higher net margin
LSH
LSH
371.7% more per $
LSH
-22.6%
-394.3%
GURE

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
GURE
GURE
LSH
LSH
Revenue
$9.0M
$7.0M
Net Profit
$-35.7M
$-1.6M
Gross Margin
27.2%
Operating Margin
-3.7%
-21.3%
Net Margin
-394.3%
-22.6%
Revenue YoY
303.4%
95.0%
Net Profit YoY
-921.1%
18.7%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.08

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GURE
GURE
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
$7.0M
Q3 25
$9.0M
$6.1M
Q2 25
$8.3M
$6.3M
Q1 25
$3.8M
Q4 24
$3.6M
Q3 24
$4.1M
Q4 23
$6.9M
Q3 23
$5.9M
Net Profit
GURE
GURE
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
$-1.6M
Q3 25
$-35.7M
$-1.4M
Q2 25
$-773.8K
$-893.1K
Q1 25
$-1.1M
Q4 24
$-1.9M
Q3 24
$-1.3M
Q4 23
$-58.8M
Q3 23
$-1.8M
Gross Margin
GURE
GURE
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
27.2%
Q3 25
18.2%
Q2 25
26.7%
Q1 25
18.8%
Q4 24
-1.2%
Q3 24
12.8%
Q4 23
Q3 23
Operating Margin
GURE
GURE
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
-21.3%
Q3 25
-3.7%
-20.8%
Q2 25
-9.0%
-8.9%
Q1 25
-28.2%
Q4 24
-55.6%
Q3 24
-32.5%
Q4 23
-114.7%
Q3 23
-39.1%
Net Margin
GURE
GURE
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
-22.6%
Q3 25
-394.3%
-22.2%
Q2 25
-9.3%
-14.2%
Q1 25
-28.2%
Q4 24
-54.1%
Q3 24
-32.7%
Q4 23
-855.6%
Q3 23
-30.3%
EPS (diluted)
GURE
GURE
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
$-0.08
Q3 25
$-0.09
Q2 25
$-0.11
Q1 25
$-0.14
Q4 24
$-0.26
Q3 24
$-0.18
Q4 23
Q3 23

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GURE
GURE
LSH
LSH
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$107.5M
$12.2M
Total Assets
$131.9M
$24.3M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.20×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GURE
GURE
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
$1.6M
Q3 25
$4.5M
Q2 25
$5.0M
Q1 25
$1.5M
Q4 24
$1.1M
Q3 24
$2.7M
Q4 23
$72.2M
Q3 23
Total Debt
GURE
GURE
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
$2.4M
Q3 25
$2.4M
Q2 25
$1.4M
Q1 25
$774.2K
Q4 24
$784.8K
Q3 24
$589.9K
Q4 23
Q3 23
Stockholders' Equity
GURE
GURE
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
$12.2M
Q3 25
$107.5M
$7.0M
Q2 25
$142.2M
$2.8M
Q1 25
$749.8K
Q4 24
$1.6M
Q3 24
$3.6M
Q4 23
$205.2M
Q3 23
$260.7M
Total Assets
GURE
GURE
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
$24.3M
Q3 25
$131.9M
$18.6M
Q2 25
$164.6M
$14.4M
Q1 25
$9.9M
Q4 24
$9.8M
Q3 24
$10.8M
Q4 23
$226.7M
Q3 23
$278.9M
Debt / Equity
GURE
GURE
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
0.20×
Q3 25
0.35×
Q2 25
0.48×
Q1 25
1.03×
Q4 24
0.48×
Q3 24
0.16×
Q4 23
Q3 23

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GURE
GURE
LSH
LSH
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$6.7M
$-453.5K
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GURE
GURE
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
$-453.5K
Q3 25
$6.7M
$-4.0M
Q2 25
$-559.3K
$-483.7K
Q1 25
$-238.3K
Q4 24
$-530.2K
Q3 24
$-1.4M
Q4 23
$-42.6M
Q3 23
$-1.1M
Free Cash Flow
GURE
GURE
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
$-497.4K
Q1 25
Q4 24
$-560.5K
Q3 24
$-1.4M
Q4 23
Q3 23
$-16.3M
FCF Margin
GURE
GURE
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
-7.9%
Q1 25
Q4 24
-15.6%
Q3 24
-34.5%
Q4 23
Q3 23
-277.7%
Capex Intensity
GURE
GURE
LSH
LSH
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
0.2%
Q1 25
0.0%
Q4 24
0.8%
Q3 24
0.1%
Q4 23
Q3 23
258.3%

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GURE
GURE

Bromine$8.1M89%
Shandong Shouguang Shenrunfa Marine Chemical Company Limited$1.4M15%

LSH
LSH

Transferred Over Time$4.6M65%
Distribution Of Pharmaceutical Products$2.4M35%

Related Comparisons