vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GULF RESOURCES, INC. (GURE) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SuperCom Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.2M vs $9.0M, roughly 1.6× GULF RESOURCES, INC.). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs -394.3%, a 431.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GULF RESOURCES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (303.4% vs -1.5%).
EOG Resources, Inc. is an American energy company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in the Heritage Plaza building in Houston, Texas.
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
GURE vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.0M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $-35.7M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | -394.3% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 303.4% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -921.1% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3M | $14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $5.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $8.0M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 23 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $18.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-35.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-773.8K | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-58.8M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-681.8K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 23 | $-557.7K | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $-2.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 61.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 8.5% | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 23 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.0% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | -114.7% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -39.1% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -11.5% | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 23 | -8.6% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | -2.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | -394.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.3% | 37.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 23 | -855.6% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -8.5% | -18.3% | ||
| Q1 23 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | -14.5% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.19 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-10.66 | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.5M | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $131.9M | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q4 23 | $72.2M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $32.9M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $107.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.2M | $37.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | $205.2M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $260.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $260.3M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 23 | $274.8M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $271.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | $131.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $164.6M | $65.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | $226.7M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $278.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $278.3M | $40.8M | ||
| Q1 23 | $295.7M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $292.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 9.49× | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.7M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-559.3K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-950.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | $-42.6M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $6.2M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 23 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $14.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-16.3M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $6.2M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 23 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $9.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -25.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -277.7% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 77.0% | -31.5% | ||
| Q1 23 | 51.6% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | 52.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 258.3% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 23 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | 23.4% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.32× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GURE
| Bromine | $8.1M | 89% |
| Shandong Shouguang Shenrunfa Marine Chemical Company Limited | $1.4M | 15% |
SPCB
Segment breakdown not available.
