vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Globavend Holdings Ltd (GVH) and Snail, Inc. (SNAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snail, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.1M vs $13.7M, roughly 1.8× Globavend Holdings Ltd). Globavend Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 3.3% vs -3.4%, a 6.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Globavend Holdings Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (63.7% vs -4.2%).
Globavend Holdings Ltd is a provider of smart unattended retail solutions, focusing on the design, supply, and operation of intelligent vending machines. It primarily serves markets across Australia, New Zealand, and Southeast Asia, offering end-to-end services including hardware manufacturing, inventory management software, and after-sales support to clients in retail, FMCG, and workplace service segments.
Suzhou Snail Digital Technology Co., Ltd., doing business as Snail, is a Chinese video game company and a Virtual Network Operator headquartered in Suzhou, China, which has branches Snail Games and Snail Mobile. Its division, Snail USA, markets Snail Games products in North America, South America, & Europe. Snail Games products include massively multiplayer online (MMOs), real-time strategy (RTS), and casual games. Its global registered user base has reached over 70 million accounts. The U.S....
GVH vs SNAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.7M | $25.1M |
| Net Profit | $450.3K | $-862.2K |
| Gross Margin | 10.5% | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | -6.0% |
| Net Margin | 3.3% | -3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 63.7% | -4.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -49.9% | -177.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $6.01 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $25.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.7M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.4M | $14.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-862.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $450.3K | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $235.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $898.8K | $-1.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | 29.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | 14.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -71.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | -20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -15.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -56.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | -9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | -12.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.01 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.57 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $915.2K | $8.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $14.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.7M | $-16.4M |
| Total Assets | $6.4M | $59.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $915.2K | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5M | $16.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-16.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4M | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $59.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | $64.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $66.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $75.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | $78.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-906.3K | $-5.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -8.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.01× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-906.3K | $764.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $206.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-256.6K | $6.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-730.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -21.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.29× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GVH
Segment breakdown not available.
SNAL
| Pc | $14.7M | 59% |
| Platform Three | $5.2M | 21% |
| Platform Two | $3.3M | 13% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer Mobile Sale | $1.6M | 6% |
