vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Globavend Holdings Ltd (GVH) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SuperCom Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.2M vs $13.7M, roughly 1.0× Globavend Holdings Ltd). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs 3.3%, a 34.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Globavend Holdings Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (63.7% vs -1.5%). Globavend Holdings Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.2M vs $-3.6M).
Globavend Holdings Ltd is a provider of smart unattended retail solutions, focusing on the design, supply, and operation of intelligent vending machines. It primarily serves markets across Australia, New Zealand, and Southeast Asia, offering end-to-end services including hardware manufacturing, inventory management software, and after-sales support to clients in retail, FMCG, and workplace service segments.
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
GVH vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.7M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $450.3K | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 10.5% | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | 3.3% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 63.7% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -49.9% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $6.01 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $6.3M |
| Q2 25 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $450.3K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $898.8K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-5.2M |
| Q2 25 | — | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 41.8% |
| Q2 25 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -49.9% |
| Q2 25 | — | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -18.3% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -82.4% |
| Q2 25 | — | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.57 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-10.66 | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-1.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $915.2K | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.7M | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $6.4M | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $915.2K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $2.9M |
| Q2 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $32.9M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $32.3M |
| Q2 25 | — | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $3.7M |
| Q2 25 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $42.7M |
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 9.49× | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 8.68× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-906.3K | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.2M | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -8.8% | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.01× | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-906.3K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-950.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-256.6K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-4.1M |
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-730.0K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-4.4M |
| Q2 25 | — | -25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -31.5% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -70.4% |
| Q2 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 4.4% |
| Q2 25 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.01× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
