vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Hyatt Hotels Corp (H) and LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC (LSTR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Hyatt Hotels Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.5× LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC). LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs -1.1%, a 4.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyatt Hotels Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.7% vs 1.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Hyatt Hotels Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.2% CAGR vs -2.2%).

Hyatt Hotels Corporation, commonly known as Hyatt Hotels & Resorts, is an American multinational hospitality company headquartered in the Riverside Plaza area of Chicago that manages and franchises luxury and business hotels, resorts, and vacation properties. Hyatt Hotels & Resorts is one of the businesses managed by the Pritzker family. Hyatt has more than 1350 hotels and all-inclusive properties in 69 countries, across North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.

Landstar System, Inc. is an American transportation services company specializing in logistics and, more specifically, third-party logistics. Landstar utilizes an extensive network of over 8,800 independent owner-operators, referred to internally as business capacity owners (BCOs), over 1,000 independent freight agents, and over 70,000 vetted carriers. Landstar provides services principally throughout the United States and to a lesser extent in Canada and between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, ...

H vs LSTR — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
H
H
1.5× larger
H
$1.8B
$1.2B
LSTR
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
H
H
+10.0% gap
H
11.7%
1.6%
LSTR
Higher net margin
LSTR
LSTR
4.5% more per $
LSTR
3.4%
-1.1%
H
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
H
H
Annualised
H
2.2%
-2.2%
LSTR

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Revenue
$1.8B
$1.2B
Net Profit
$-20.0M
$39.4M
Gross Margin
9.6%
Operating Margin
0.4%
4.5%
Net Margin
-1.1%
3.4%
Revenue YoY
11.7%
1.6%
Net Profit YoY
64.3%
32.3%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.20
$1.16

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
$1.2B
Q4 25
$1.8B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$1.8B
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.8B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$1.7B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.6B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.6B
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.7B
$1.2B
Net Profit
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
$39.4M
Q4 25
$-20.0M
$23.9M
Q3 25
$-49.0M
$19.4M
Q2 25
$-3.0M
$41.9M
Q1 25
$20.0M
$29.8M
Q4 24
$-56.0M
$46.2M
Q3 24
$471.0M
$50.0M
Q2 24
$359.0M
$52.6M
Gross Margin
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
9.6%
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Operating Margin
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
4.5%
Q4 25
0.4%
2.5%
Q3 25
-1.0%
2.2%
Q2 25
2.1%
4.6%
Q1 25
3.0%
3.4%
Q4 24
-3.0%
4.8%
Q3 24
37.3%
5.2%
Q2 24
27.1%
5.6%
Net Margin
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
3.4%
Q4 25
-1.1%
2.0%
Q3 25
-2.7%
1.6%
Q2 25
-0.2%
3.5%
Q1 25
1.2%
2.6%
Q4 24
-3.5%
3.8%
Q3 24
28.9%
4.1%
Q2 24
21.1%
4.3%
EPS (diluted)
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
$1.16
Q4 25
$-0.20
$0.70
Q3 25
$-0.51
$0.56
Q2 25
$-0.03
$1.20
Q1 25
$0.19
$0.85
Q4 24
$-0.37
$1.30
Q3 24
$4.63
$1.41
Q2 24
$3.46
$1.48

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$813.0M
$411.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$26.1M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.3B
$799.0M
Total Assets
$14.0B
$1.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.03×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
$411.0M
Q4 25
$813.0M
$452.2M
Q3 25
$749.0M
$434.4M
Q2 25
$912.0M
$426.2M
Q1 25
$1.8B
$473.4M
Q4 24
$1.4B
$566.6M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$531.3M
Q2 24
$2.0B
$504.0M
Total Debt
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
$26.1M
Q4 25
$0
Q3 25
$6.0B
$0
Q2 25
$6.0B
$0
Q1 25
$4.3B
$0
Q4 24
$3.8B
$0
Q3 24
$3.1B
$0
Q2 24
$3.9B
$0
Stockholders' Equity
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
$799.0M
Q4 25
$3.3B
$795.7M
Q3 25
$3.5B
$888.7M
Q2 25
$3.6B
$921.8M
Q1 25
$3.5B
$930.8M
Q4 24
$3.5B
$972.4M
Q3 24
$3.7B
$1.0B
Q2 24
$3.9B
$1.0B
Total Assets
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
$1.6B
Q4 25
$14.0B
$1.6B
Q3 25
$15.7B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$15.9B
$1.7B
Q1 25
$14.0B
$1.7B
Q4 24
$13.3B
$1.8B
Q3 24
$11.9B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$12.8B
$1.8B
Debt / Equity
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
0.03×
Q4 25
0.00×
Q3 25
1.73×
0.00×
Q2 25
1.69×
0.00×
Q1 25
1.25×
0.00×
Q4 24
1.07×
0.00×
Q3 24
0.85×
0.00×
Q2 24
1.01×
0.00×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$313.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$236.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
13.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$159.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
Q4 25
$313.0M
$72.7M
Q3 25
$-20.0M
$89.3M
Q2 25
$-67.0M
$7.1M
Q1 25
$153.0M
$55.7M
Q4 24
$235.0M
$61.1M
Q3 24
$-21.0M
$83.1M
Q2 24
$177.0M
$48.1M
Free Cash Flow
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
Q4 25
$236.0M
$70.5M
Q3 25
$-89.0M
$86.0M
Q2 25
$-111.0M
$4.7M
Q1 25
$123.0M
$53.8M
Q4 24
$184.0M
$54.4M
Q3 24
$-64.0M
$75.6M
Q2 24
$135.0M
$40.6M
FCF Margin
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
Q4 25
13.2%
6.0%
Q3 25
-5.0%
7.1%
Q2 25
-6.1%
0.4%
Q1 25
7.2%
4.7%
Q4 24
11.5%
4.5%
Q3 24
-3.9%
6.2%
Q2 24
7.9%
3.3%
Capex Intensity
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.3%
0.2%
Q3 25
3.9%
0.3%
Q2 25
2.4%
0.2%
Q1 25
1.7%
0.2%
Q4 24
3.2%
0.6%
Q3 24
2.6%
0.6%
Q2 24
2.5%
0.6%
Cash Conversion
H
H
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.04×
Q3 25
4.61×
Q2 25
0.17×
Q1 25
7.65×
1.87×
Q4 24
1.32×
Q3 24
-0.04×
1.66×
Q2 24
0.49×
0.91×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

H
H

Other$627.0M35%
Rooms Revenue$326.0M18%
Net Fees$290.0M16%
Distribution Segment$177.0M10%
Franchise And Other Fees$114.0M6%
Base Management Fees$112.0M6%
Incentive Management Fees$81.0M5%
Other Owned And Leased Hotel Revenue$41.0M2%
Contra Revenue$17.0M1%
Other Revenues$4.0M0%

LSTR
LSTR

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons