vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HANMI FINANCIAL CORP (HAFC) and UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ (OLED). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.2M vs $71.2M, roughly 2.0× HANMI FINANCIAL CORP). HANMI FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 25.2%, a 4.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HANMI FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.1% vs -14.5%). Over the past eight quarters, HANMI FINANCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (10.4% CAGR vs -5.3%).
Hanmi Bank Corporation is a community bank headquartered in Los Angeles, California, with 35 branches and eight loan production offices in California, Texas, Illinois, New York, New Jersey and Virginia.
Universal Display Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials, and it is a provider of services to the display and lighting industries.
HAFC vs OLED — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $71.2M | $142.2M |
| Net Profit | $21.2M | $35.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 74.6% |
| Operating Margin | 29.8% | 30.1% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | 25.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.1% | -14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 20.0% | -44.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.70 | $0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $142.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $71.2M | $172.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.0M | $139.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.2M | $171.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.8M | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.8M | $162.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.5M | $161.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.7M | $158.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.2M | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.1M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.1M | $67.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.7M | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.9M | $66.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.5M | $52.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 75.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.8% | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.1% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.1% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.1% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.5% | 41.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.5% | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.8% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.1% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.1% | 38.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.1% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.5% | 41.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.5% | 33.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.70 | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.73 | $0.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | $1.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | $1.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.49 | $1.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.48 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $516.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $796.4M | — |
| Total Assets | $7.9B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $516.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $602.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $603.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $571.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $492.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $551.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $530.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $796.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $779.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $762.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $751.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $732.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $736.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $707.1M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6B | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $206.0M | $108.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $203.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 286.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.70× | 3.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $356.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $108.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $206.0M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.9M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.0M | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.6M | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7M | $79.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1M | $67.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $203.7M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.4M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.6M | $37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.6M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.9M | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $57.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 286.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 206.3% | 60.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.0% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.7% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.1% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.70× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.66× | 2.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.26× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.97× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.45× | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | 1.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HAFC
Segment breakdown not available.
OLED
| Material sales | $83.7M | 59% |
| Royalty and license fees | $54.2M | 38% |
| Contract research services | $4.3M | 3% |
