vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HANMI FINANCIAL CORP (HAFC) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HANMI FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($71.2M vs $39.4M, roughly 1.8× SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC runs the higher net margin — 54.9% vs 29.8%, a 25.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HANMI FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.1% vs 1.1%). HANMI FINANCIAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($203.7M vs $14.4M). Over the past eight quarters, SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC's revenue compounded faster (14.1% CAGR vs 10.4%).
Hanmi Bank Corporation is a community bank headquartered in Los Angeles, California, with 35 branches and eight loan production offices in California, Texas, Illinois, New York, New Jersey and Virginia.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
HAFC vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $71.2M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $21.2M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 29.8% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.1% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 20.0% | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.70 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $71.2M | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.0M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.2M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.8M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.8M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.5M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.7M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $58.4M | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | $21.2M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.1M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.1M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.7M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.9M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.5M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.2M | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | 29.8% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.1% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.1% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.1% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.5% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.5% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.0% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 29.8% | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.1% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.1% | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.1% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.5% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.5% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.0% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.70 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.73 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.49 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.48 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.50 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $796.4M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $7.9B | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | $796.4M | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $779.5M | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $762.8M | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $751.5M | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $732.2M | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $736.7M | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $707.1M | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $703.1M | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9B | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7B | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7B | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6B | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.5B | $527.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $206.0M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $203.7M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 286.2% | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.70× | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $356.1M | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $206.0M | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.9M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.0M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.6M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.0M | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | $203.7M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.4M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.6M | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.6M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.9M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.2M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | 286.2% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 206.3% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.0% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.7% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.1% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.0% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | 9.70× | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.66× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.26× | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.97× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.45× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.98× | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HAFC
Segment breakdown not available.
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
