vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HANMI FINANCIAL CORP (HAFC) and SILICOM LTD. (SILC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HANMI FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($71.2M vs $61.9M, roughly 1.1× SILICOM LTD.). HANMI FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -18.5%, a 48.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HANMI FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.1% vs 6.6%). HANMI FINANCIAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($203.7M vs $-3.3M).
Hanmi Bank Corporation is a community bank headquartered in Los Angeles, California, with 35 branches and eight loan production offices in California, Texas, Illinois, New York, New Jersey and Virginia.
Silicom Ltd. is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that specializes in the design, manufacture and marketing of connectivity solutions for a range of servers and server-based systems. Its shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Silicom is a member of the RAD Group family of companies.
HAFC vs SILC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $71.2M | $61.9M |
| Net Profit | $21.2M | $-11.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 29.8% | -19.8% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | -18.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.1% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 20.0% | 16.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.70 | $-2.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $71.2M | $61.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.8M | $58.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $58.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $21.2M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.8% | -19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.1% | -22.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.8% | -18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.1% | -23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.70 | $-2.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.73 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $-2.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.49 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.48 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.50 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $42.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $796.4M | $117.5M |
| Total Assets | $7.9B | $152.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $72.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $796.4M | $117.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $779.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $762.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $751.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $732.2M | $127.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $736.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $707.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $703.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $152.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | $150.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.5B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $206.0M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $203.7M | $-3.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 286.2% | -5.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.70× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $356.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $206.0M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.6M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $203.7M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.9M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 286.2% | -5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 206.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 82.1% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.66× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.26× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.97× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.98× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
