vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) and TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC (TR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($196.3M vs $114.8M, roughly 1.7× HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.). TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs -46.8%, a 61.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.3% vs 1.5%). Over the past eight quarters, TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 4.2%).
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) is a specialized investment firm focused on sustainable infrastructure assets covering renewable energy, energy efficiency, sustainable real estate and low-carbon utility segments. It primarily operates in North American markets, providing long-term capital to eligible sustainable projects and delivering stable risk-adjusted returns to investors through recurring cash flows from operational underlying assets.
Tootsie Roll Industries is an American manufacturer of confectionery based in Chicago, Illinois. Its best-known products include the namesake Tootsie Rolls and Tootsie Pops. Tootsie Roll Industries currently markets its brands internationally in Canada, Mexico, and over 75 other countries.
HASI vs TR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $114.8M | $196.3M |
| Net Profit | $-53.8M | $28.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | -57.4% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | -46.8% | 14.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.3% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -176.7% | 27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.38 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $114.8M | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.1M | $232.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.7M | $155.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.9M | $148.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.3M | $193.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.0M | $225.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.5M | $150.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $105.8M | $153.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-53.8M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.3M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.4M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.6M | $18.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.1M | $22.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.6M | $32.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.5M | $15.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.0M | $15.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 32.7% |
| Q4 25 | -57.4% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 84.7% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.9% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | -46.8% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 80.8% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 114.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.4% | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 69.2% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -23.9% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 116.3% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.38 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.61 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.74 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $110.2M | $176.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $941.0M |
| Total Assets | $8.2B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $110.2M | $176.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.8M | $119.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.5M | $170.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.4M | $176.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.8M | $194.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.1M | $163.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.7M | $131.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.4M | $159.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $941.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $918.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $893.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $879.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $870.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $870.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $841.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $834.4M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7B | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $167.3M | $73.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $61.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 31.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 6.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $96.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $167.3M | $73.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-121.8M | $62.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $68.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.9M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.8M | $-12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.9M | $21.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $750.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.46× | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.81× | -0.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.66× | 0.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.08× | 3.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.94× | -0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.17× | 1.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HASI
Segment breakdown not available.
TR
| Products | $194.3M | 99% |
| Rental And Royalty | $1.9M | 1% |
