vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Huachen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co., Ltd (HCAI) and Prelude Therapeutics Inc (PRLD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Huachen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co., Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.1M vs $6.5M, roughly 1.3× Prelude Therapeutics Inc). Huachen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co., Ltd runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs -303.5%, a 313.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Huachen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co., Ltd. is a smart parking solution provider that uses artificial intelligence and IoT technologies to deliver integrated parking management systems, intelligent parking lot operations, and value-added services for property operators, municipal authorities and commercial complexes mainly in China, helping optimize parking space utilization, cut operational costs and improve user parking experience.
HCAI vs PRLD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.1M | $6.5M |
| Net Profit | $815.9K | $-19.7M |
| Gross Margin | 31.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.7% | -314.1% |
| Net Margin | 10.0% | -303.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 116.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 38.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $-0.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-19.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $815.9K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-32.3M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -314.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1145.9% |
| Q3 25 | — | -303.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1075.7% |
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.5K | $55.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $23.5M | $58.5M |
| Total Assets | $57.6M | $94.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.5K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $153.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | $58.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $156.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | $94.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.5M | $-19.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -6.68× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $-19.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-27.3M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-27.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -912.0% |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.1% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.68× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
