vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM) and Janus International Group, Inc. (JBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.8M vs $219.3M, roughly 1.2× Janus International Group, Inc.). Janus International Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.9% vs 0.7%, a 6.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Janus International Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.7% vs -16.5%). Janus International Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.3M vs $3.4M).
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
Janus Henderson is a British-American global asset management group headquartered in the City of London, United Kingdom. It offers a range of financial products to individuals, intermediary advisors, and institutional investors globally under the trade name Janus Henderson Investors.
HCM vs JBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.8M | $219.3M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $15.2M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | -13.2% | 13.4% |
| Net Margin | 0.7% | 6.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.5% | -4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.6% | 28.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $270.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $219.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.7M | $228.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $324.5M | $210.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $230.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $230.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.7M | $248.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $254.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $455.0M | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | $10.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $300.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.7M |
| Q4 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.0% | 38.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 39.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.1% | 43.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 43.4% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | 12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.0% | 20.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 163.8% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $93.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $560.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.08× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $836.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $102.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $802.5M | $110.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $93.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $560.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $543.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $759.9M | $526.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $518.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $526.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $740.1M | $556.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $535.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.2M | $15.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.4M | $8.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.2% | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.21× | 0.99× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-96.2M | $140.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.9M | $51.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.3M | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.8M | $31.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $28.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.2M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $41.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $45.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-49.9M | $25.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $24.0M |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.6% | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.16× | 2.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.38× | 4.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 171.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.54× | 1.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HCM
Segment breakdown not available.
JBI
| Self Storage New Construction | $72.3M | 33% |
| Commercial And Others | $65.5M | 30% |
| Self Storage R3 | $54.0M | 25% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $15.5M | 7% |
| Transferred Over Time | $12.8M | 6% |
