vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM) and LendingClub Corp (LC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.8M vs $252.3M, roughly 1.1× LendingClub Corp). LendingClub Corp runs the higher net margin — 20.5% vs 0.7%, a 19.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LendingClub Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -16.5%).
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.
HCM vs LC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.8M | $252.3M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $51.6M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -13.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.7% | 20.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.5% | 15.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.6% | 341.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $252.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $270.8M | $266.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $266.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.7M | $248.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $324.5M | $217.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $217.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $201.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.7M | $187.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $44.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $455.0M | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | $14.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.0% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 163.8% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | 8.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $93.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $11.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.08× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $836.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $802.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $93.2M | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.4M | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.8M | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $759.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $740.1M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $11.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $10.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $9.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.08× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.08× | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.11× | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.21× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-96.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-770.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.9M | $-713.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.3M | $-339.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-669.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.8M | $-932.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $-2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-791.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.2M | $-803.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $-352.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-682.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-49.9M | $-945.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | -1076.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -297.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.6% | -323.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | -161.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1237.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -338.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | -504.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 52.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 6.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -17.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.16× | -18.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.38× | -29.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -46.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.54× | -62.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
