vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM) and Lovesac Co (LOVE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.8M vs $150.2M, roughly 1.8× Lovesac Co). HUTCHMED (China) Ltd runs the higher net margin — 0.7% vs -7.0%, a 7.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Lovesac Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.2% vs -16.5%). HUTCHMED (China) Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.4M vs $-10.2M).
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
The Lovesac Company is an American furniture retailer, specializing in a patented modular furniture system called Sactionals. Sactionals consist of two combinable pieces, “Seats” and “Sides,” as well as custom-fit covers and associated accessories. Lovesac also sells Sacs, a bag seat filled with a proprietary foam mixture.
HCM vs LOVE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.8M | $150.2M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $-10.6M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 56.1% |
| Operating Margin | -13.2% | -10.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.7% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.5% | 0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.6% | -114.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $-0.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $270.8M | $150.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $160.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.7M | $138.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $324.5M | $241.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $149.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $156.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.7M | $132.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $250.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $455.0M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | $35.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $31.0M |
| Q4 25 | 37.7% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 56.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.0% | 60.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.1% | 54.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 59.7% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | -10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | 19.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.0% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 163.8% | -7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 14.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | -9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $-0.72 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $2.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $-0.83 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | $23.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $93.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $189.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $495.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.08× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $23.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $26.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $836.1M | $83.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $61.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $802.5M | $72.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $87.0M |
| Q4 25 | $93.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $189.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $197.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $201.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $759.9M | $216.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $196.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $202.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $740.1M | $205.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $217.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $495.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $493.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $483.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $532.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $499.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $481.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $477.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $482.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.2M | $-4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.4M | $-10.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.2% | -6.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.21× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-96.2M | $-13.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.9M | $-41.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.3M | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.8M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $56.3M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.2M | $-50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $38.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $119.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-49.9M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $49.5M |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | -6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.6% | -36.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.16× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.38× | 1.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.82× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HCM
Segment breakdown not available.
LOVE
| Showrooms | $102.7M | 68% |
| Internet | $37.3M | 25% |
| Other | $10.2M | 7% |
