vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM) and PRA GROUP INC (PRAA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

PRA GROUP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($333.4M vs $270.8M, roughly 1.2× HUTCHMED (China) Ltd). PRA GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 0.7%, a 16.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PRA GROUP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.7% vs -16.5%). HUTCHMED (China) Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.4M vs $-90.4M).

HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.

PRA Group, Inc. is a publicly traded debt buyer and debt collection company based in Norfolk, Virginia. The company buys delinquent consumer debt from credit card issuers and other financial institutions at a discount and pursues collection of the full debt owed. Founded in 1996, PRA Group employs more than 3200 people in 18 countries.

HCM vs PRAA — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PRAA
PRAA
1.2× larger
PRAA
$333.4M
$270.8M
HCM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PRAA
PRAA
+30.2% gap
PRAA
13.7%
-16.5%
HCM
Higher net margin
PRAA
PRAA
16.2% more per $
PRAA
17.0%
0.7%
HCM
More free cash flow
HCM
HCM
$93.7M more FCF
HCM
$3.4M
$-90.4M
PRAA

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Revenue
$270.8M
$333.4M
Net Profit
$2.0M
$56.5M
Gross Margin
37.7%
Operating Margin
-13.2%
37.7%
Net Margin
0.7%
17.0%
Revenue YoY
-16.5%
13.7%
Net Profit YoY
-83.6%
206.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.00
$1.47

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Q4 25
$270.8M
$333.4M
Q3 25
$311.1M
Q2 25
$277.7M
$287.7M
Q1 25
$324.5M
$269.6M
Q4 24
$293.2M
Q3 24
$281.5M
Q2 24
$305.7M
$284.2M
Q1 24
$255.6M
Net Profit
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Q4 25
$2.0M
$56.5M
Q3 25
$-407.7M
Q2 25
$455.0M
$42.4M
Q1 25
$11.9M
$3.7M
Q4 24
$18.5M
Q3 24
$27.2M
Q2 24
$25.8M
$21.5M
Q1 24
$3.5M
Gross Margin
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Q4 25
37.7%
Q3 25
Q2 25
0.1%
Q1 25
48.0%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
41.1%
Q1 24
Operating Margin
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Q4 25
-13.2%
37.7%
Q3 25
-101.4%
Q2 25
-1.3%
29.6%
Q1 25
-5.0%
27.7%
Q4 24
32.1%
Q3 24
32.0%
Q2 24
-9.0%
31.4%
Q1 24
26.0%
Net Margin
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Q4 25
0.7%
17.0%
Q3 25
-131.0%
Q2 25
163.8%
14.7%
Q1 25
3.7%
1.4%
Q4 24
6.3%
Q3 24
9.6%
Q2 24
8.4%
7.6%
Q1 24
1.4%
EPS (diluted)
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Q4 25
$0.00
$1.47
Q3 25
$-10.43
Q2 25
$0.52
$1.08
Q1 25
$0.01
$0.09
Q4 24
$0.47
Q3 24
$0.69
Q2 24
$0.03
$0.54
Q1 24
$0.09

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.4B
$104.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$93.2M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.2B
$979.9M
Total Assets
$1.8B
$5.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.08×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Q4 25
$1.4B
$104.4M
Q3 25
$107.5M
Q2 25
$1.4B
$131.6M
Q1 25
$836.1M
$128.7M
Q4 24
$105.9M
Q3 24
$141.1M
Q2 24
$802.5M
$118.9M
Q1 24
$108.1M
Total Debt
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Q4 25
$93.2M
Q3 25
Q2 25
$93.4M
Q1 25
$82.8M
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
$82.1M
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Q4 25
$1.2B
$979.9M
Q3 25
$928.5M
Q2 25
$1.2B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$759.9M
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.1B
Q3 24
$1.2B
Q2 24
$740.1M
$1.1B
Q1 24
$1.1B
Total Assets
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Q4 25
$1.8B
$5.1B
Q3 25
$5.0B
Q2 25
$1.8B
$5.4B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$5.1B
Q4 24
$4.9B
Q3 24
$4.9B
Q2 24
$1.3B
$4.7B
Q1 24
$4.5B
Debt / Equity
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Q4 25
0.08×
Q3 25
Q2 25
0.08×
Q1 25
0.11×
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
0.11×
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$8.2M
$-85.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$3.4M
$-90.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
1.2%
-27.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.8%
1.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.21×
-1.51×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-96.2M
$-169.4M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Q4 25
$8.2M
$-85.5M
Q3 25
$-10.1M
Q2 25
$-72.9M
$-12.9M
Q1 25
$40.3M
$-52.6M
Q4 24
$-94.6M
Q3 24
$-35.0M
Q2 24
$-39.8M
$-29.5M
Q1 24
$-73.0M
Free Cash Flow
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Q4 25
$3.4M
$-90.4M
Q3 25
$-11.3M
Q2 25
$-82.2M
$-14.2M
Q1 25
$32.5M
$-53.5M
Q4 24
$-98.6M
Q3 24
$-36.1M
Q2 24
$-49.9M
$-30.8M
Q1 24
$-73.5M
FCF Margin
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Q4 25
1.2%
-27.1%
Q3 25
-3.6%
Q2 25
-29.6%
-4.9%
Q1 25
10.0%
-19.8%
Q4 24
-33.6%
Q3 24
-12.8%
Q2 24
-16.3%
-10.8%
Q1 24
-28.8%
Capex Intensity
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Q4 25
1.8%
1.4%
Q3 25
0.4%
Q2 25
3.3%
0.4%
Q1 25
2.4%
0.3%
Q4 24
1.4%
Q3 24
0.4%
Q2 24
3.3%
0.5%
Q1 24
0.2%
Cash Conversion
HCM
HCM
PRAA
PRAA
Q4 25
4.21×
-1.51×
Q3 25
Q2 25
-0.16×
-0.30×
Q1 25
3.38×
-14.37×
Q4 24
-5.13×
Q3 24
-1.29×
Q2 24
-1.54×
-1.37×
Q1 24
-21.01×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

HCM
HCM

Segment breakdown not available.

PRAA
PRAA

GB$170.1M51%
Other$163.3M49%

Related Comparisons