vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM) and TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC (TR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.8M vs $196.3M, roughly 1.4× TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC). TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs 0.7%, a 13.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.5% vs -16.5%). TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($61.0M vs $3.4M).
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
Tootsie Roll Industries is an American manufacturer of confectionery based in Chicago, Illinois. Its best-known products include the namesake Tootsie Rolls and Tootsie Pops. Tootsie Roll Industries currently markets its brands internationally in Canada, Mexico, and over 75 other countries.
HCM vs TR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.8M | $196.3M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $28.8M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | -13.2% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | 0.7% | 14.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.5% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.6% | 27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $270.8M | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $232.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.7M | $155.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $324.5M | $148.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $193.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $225.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.7M | $150.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $153.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $455.0M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | $18.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | $15.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.8M |
| Q4 25 | 37.7% | 35.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.0% | 35.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.1% | 33.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 32.7% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.0% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 163.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | $176.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $93.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $941.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.08× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $176.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $119.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $170.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $836.1M | $176.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $194.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $163.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $802.5M | $131.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $159.4M |
| Q4 25 | $93.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $941.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $918.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $893.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $759.9M | $879.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $870.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $870.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $740.1M | $841.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $834.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.2M | $73.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.4M | $61.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.2% | 31.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 6.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.21× | 2.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-96.2M | $96.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $73.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $62.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.9M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.3M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $68.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.8M | $-12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $21.4M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.2M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $750.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-49.9M | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.9M |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 31.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.6% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.21× | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.16× | -0.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.38× | 0.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.54× | -0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HCM
Segment breakdown not available.
TR
| Products | $194.3M | 99% |
| Rental And Royalty | $1.9M | 1% |
