vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM) and WORLD ACCEPTANCE CORP (WRLD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.8M vs $141.3M, roughly 1.9× WORLD ACCEPTANCE CORP). HUTCHMED (China) Ltd runs the higher net margin — 0.7% vs -0.6%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WORLD ACCEPTANCE CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.9% vs -16.5%). WORLD ACCEPTANCE CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($57.2M vs $3.4M).
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
Credit Acceptance Corporation is an auto finance company providing automobile loans and other related financial products. The company operates its financial program through a national network of dealer-partners, the automobile dealers participating in the programs. The company operates two programs: the "Portfolio Program" and the "Purchase Program". Through these programs, the company can advance money to automobile dealers in exchange for the right to service the underlying consumer loans a...
HCM vs WRLD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.8M | $141.3M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $-911.3K |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -13.2% | -0.7% |
| Net Margin | 0.7% | -0.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.5% | 1.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.6% | -106.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $-0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $270.8M | $141.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $134.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.7M | $132.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $324.5M | $165.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $131.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.7M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $159.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $-911.3K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $455.0M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | $44.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $35.1M |
| Q4 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.0% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | -0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 163.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 26.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $8.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.99 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $1.79 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | $10.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $93.2M | $677.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $351.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.08× | 1.93× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $10.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $836.1M | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $802.5M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $93.2M | $677.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $584.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.4M | $472.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.8M | $447.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $561.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $506.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.1M | $494.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $498.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $351.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $365.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $427.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $759.9M | $439.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $428.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $417.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $740.1M | $422.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $424.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.08× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.08× | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.11× | 1.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.17× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.2M | $58.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.4M | $57.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.2% | 40.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.21× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-96.2M | $412.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $58.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.9M | $58.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.3M | $254.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $53.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.8M | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $265.8M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $57.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $47.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.2M | $57.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $250.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $60.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $52.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-49.9M | $47.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $259.9M |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 40.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.6% | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 151.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 163.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.16× | 43.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.38× | 5.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.54× | 4.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.58× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
