vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HELEN OF TROY LTD (HELE) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HELEN OF TROY LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($512.8M vs $425.3M, roughly 1.2× Verisign). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs -16.4%, a 64.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Verisign posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs -3.4%). Verisign produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.1M vs $5.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Verisign's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Helen of Troy Limited is an American publicly traded designer, developer and worldwide marketer of consumer brand-name housewares, health and home, and beauty products under owned and licensed brands. It is the parent corporation of OXO International Ltd., Kaz, Inc., Steel Technology, LLC, and Idelle Labs, Ltd, among others. The company is headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda, with U.S. operations headquartered in El Paso, Texas. The company is named after the mythic figure Helen of Troy.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
HELE vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $512.8M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $-84.1M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | 46.9% | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | -1.6% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | -16.4% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.4% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -269.4% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.65 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $512.8M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $431.8M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $371.7M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $485.9M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.7M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.2M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.8M | $387.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $489.2M | $384.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-84.1M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-308.6M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-450.7M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.9M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.6M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $198.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.7M | $194.1M |
| Q4 25 | 46.9% | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.2% | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.1% | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.6% | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.9% | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.6% | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.7% | 87.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.0% | 87.2% |
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -73.1% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -109.5% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.2% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.5% | 67.4% |
| Q4 25 | -16.4% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -71.5% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -121.3% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.3% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 50.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.65 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.44 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.65 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.20 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.17 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.74 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.76 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.1M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $852.3M | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.1M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.4M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.7M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.8M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.1M | $689.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | $924.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $921.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $672.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $852.3M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $926.3M | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $-1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $-1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.41× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $11.9M | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $5.8M | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.1% | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $55.9M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.9M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.5M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.3M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.0M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.6M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.3M | $160.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $73.6M | $257.3M |
| Q4 25 | $5.8M | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.9M | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.0M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $191.0K | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.7M | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.6M | $253.5M |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.1% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.1% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.6% | 66.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.17× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.62× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.08× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.72× | 1.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HELE
| Beauty Wellness | $283.2M | 55% |
| Home Outdoor | $229.6M | 45% |
VRSN
Segment breakdown not available.
