vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hess Midstream LP (HESM) and KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KILROY REALTY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($272.2M vs $204.1M, roughly 1.3× Hess Midstream LP). Hess Midstream LP runs the higher net margin — 77.3% vs 6.3%, a 71.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hess Midstream LP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.1% vs -5.0%). Over the past eight quarters, KILROY REALTY CORP's revenue compounded faster (-1.2% CAGR vs -25.3%).
Hess Corporation is an American global independent energy company involved in the exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas. It was formed by the merger of Hess Oil and Chemical and Amerada Petroleum in 1968. Leon Hess was CEO from the early 1960s until 1995, after which his son John B Hess succeeded him as chairman and CEO. The company agreed to be acquired by rival oil company Chevron in October 2023, and the acquisition closed in July 2025.
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
HESM vs KRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $204.1M | $272.2M |
| Net Profit | $157.7M | $17.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 116.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 77.3% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.1% | -5.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2.3% | -73.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.68 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $204.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $404.2M | $272.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.9M | $279.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $414.2M | $289.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $382.0M | $270.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $395.9M | $286.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $378.5M | $289.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $365.5M | $280.7M |
| Q1 26 | $157.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $93.3M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.7M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.3M | $79.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.6M | $43.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.4M | $65.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.5M | $54.5M |
| Q1 26 | 116.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 62.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 77.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.2% | 58.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.8% | 27.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.7% | 16.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.5% | 19.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.68 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.57 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.41 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $179.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $5.4B |
| Total Assets | — | $10.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | $179.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $372.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5M | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1M | $146.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3M | $165.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3M | $625.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.6M | $835.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $10.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | $10.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | $11.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $253.3M | $566.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $450.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 165.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 51.4% | 42.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.61× | 33.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $833.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $253.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $245.6M | $566.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $258.9M | $176.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $276.9M | $143.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.4M | $136.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.5M | $541.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.9M | $176.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.6M | $88.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $178.9M | $450.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $178.9M | $148.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $213.5M | $118.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $156.9M | $115.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $163.4M | $440.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.6M | $147.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.7M | $69.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.3% | 165.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.5% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.5% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.1% | 42.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.3% | 153.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.0% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.8% | 24.7% |
| Q1 26 | 51.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.0% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.9% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.5% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | 1.61× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.63× | 33.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.65× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.07× | 1.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.83× | 3.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.67× | 8.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.84× | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.49× | 1.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HESM
| Affiliate services | $197.9M | 97% |
| Third-party services | $6.2M | 3% |
KRC
Segment breakdown not available.
