vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (HFBL) and Scilex Holding Co (SCLX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0M vs $4.8M, roughly 1.3× Scilex Holding Co). Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana runs the higher net margin — 27.8% vs -961.9%, a 989.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs -67.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana's revenue compounded faster (10.7% CAGR vs -33.6%).
Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana is a U.S. bank holding company based in Louisiana. It operates community banking services via its subsidiary, offering retail customers and local small businesses a full suite of financial products including deposit accounts, consumer loans, mortgage loans, and commercial financing, primarily serving local markets across Louisiana.
Scilex Holding Co is a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical firm focused on developing and commercializing innovative non-opioid pain management therapies for acute and chronic pain segments. It primarily serves the US market, offering prescription and over-the-counter pain relief solutions for patients and healthcare providers.
HFBL vs SCLX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0M | $4.8M |
| Net Profit | $1.7M | $-46.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 45.5% |
| Operating Margin | 35.1% | -2317.8% |
| Net Margin | 27.8% | -961.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.2% | -67.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 64.2% | -613.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.54 | $-4.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2M | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9M | $10.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $-46.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6M | $-257.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-44.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $748.0K | $-26.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $941.0K | $-4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $638.0K | $-37.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $732.0K | $-24.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 45.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 68.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 66.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 72.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 73.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 73.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 64.7% |
| Q4 25 | 35.1% | -2317.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | -1766.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.5% | -207.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | -557.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.7% | -190.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | -138.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | -95.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.5% | -179.0% |
| Q4 25 | 27.8% | -961.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | -2441.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.9% | -445.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | -521.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | -43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | -30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.1% | -229.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.9% | -224.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.54 | $-4.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.52 | $-22.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.38 | $-7.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.24 | $-2.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | $8.53 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.31 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | $-7.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.24 | $-8.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $5.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $57.7M | $-207.8M |
| Total Assets | $621.4M | $365.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $878.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $77.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | $57.7M | $-207.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.6M | $-176.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.2M | $-249.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $54.7M | $-211.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $53.9M | $-192.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.3M | $-211.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.8M | $-214.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.5M | $-189.8M |
| Q4 25 | $621.4M | $365.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $622.6M | $275.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $609.5M | $83.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $619.6M | $79.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $607.8M | $93.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.4M | $100.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $637.5M | $104.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $643.0M | $91.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.9M | $-17.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.70× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | $-17.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $991.0K | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $871.0K | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $650.0K | $9.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $843.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.64× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.32× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.63× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.89× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
