vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH) and Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($624.4M vs $588.0M, roughly 1.1× Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.). Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.0% vs 1.0%, a 14.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.1% vs -33.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (91.0% CAGR vs -0.8%).
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc., formerly the Howard Hughes Corporation, is a real estate development and management company based in The Woodlands, Texas. It was formed in 2010 as a spin-off from General Growth Properties (GGP). Most of its holdings are focused on several master-planned communities. It took its name from the original Howard Hughes Corporation, which had developed the planned community of Summerlin, Nevada, and later became a subsidiary of GGP.
Simpson Manufacturing Company is a leading building materials manufacturer in the United States that produces structural connectors, fasteners, anchors, and products for new construction and retrofitting.
HHH vs SSD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $624.4M | $588.0M |
| Net Profit | $6.0M | $88.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 19.5% |
| Net Margin | 1.0% | 15.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -33.2% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.2% | 13.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.20 | $2.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $588.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $624.4M | $539.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $390.2M | $623.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.9M | $631.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $199.3M | $538.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $935.0M | $517.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.1M | $587.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $317.4M | $597.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $88.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | $56.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.5M | $107.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.1M | $103.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $77.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.3M | $55.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.8M | $93.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.1M | $97.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 46.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 46.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 46.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.6% | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.0% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.5% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.6% | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | 22.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.7% | 16.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.7% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 16.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.13 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.20 | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.02 | $2.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $2.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $1.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.14 | $1.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.46 | $2.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $2.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5B | $341.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $10.6B | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.35× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $341.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $384.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $297.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $190.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $493.7M | $150.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $596.1M | $239.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $400.7M | $339.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $436.8M | $354.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $300.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $371.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $376.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $382.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $388.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $393.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $399.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.35× | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.85× | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.23× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $360.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $348.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 55.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 60.04× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $417.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $360.3M | $155.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $149.8M | $170.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.3M | $125.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-224.9M | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $337.1M | $115.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $248.3M | $103.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.5M | $111.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.6M | $119.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.7M | $133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $169.7M | $87.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-238.4M | $-42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.1M | $60.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.7M | $58.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.1M | $70.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 55.8% | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.3% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.1% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -119.6% | -7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.9% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.9% | 11.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.9% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 6.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 60.04× | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.25× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.35× | 0.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | 2.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.41× | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.83× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HHH
| Transferred At Point In Time | $499.8M | 80% |
| Operating Assets Segment | $117.9M | 19% |
| Builder Price Participation | $12.9M | 2% |
SSD
Segment breakdown not available.
