vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HARTE HANKS INC (HHS) and MID PENN BANCORP INC (MPB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MID PENN BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.0M vs $39.9M, roughly 1.6× HARTE HANKS INC). MID PENN BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 31.4% vs 5.5%, a 25.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MID PENN BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.8% vs -15.4%). MID PENN BANCORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($71.8M vs $-686.0K). Over the past eight quarters, MID PENN BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (21.1% CAGR vs -6.4%).
Harte Hanks is a global marketing services company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts. Harte Hanks services include analytics, strategy, marketing technology, creative services, digital marketing, customer care, direct mail, logistics, and fulfillment.
Commerce Bancorp was a Cherry Hill, New Jersey–based bank created in 1973. In 2007, it was purchased by Toronto-Dominion Bank, which merged Commerce into TD Banknorth, the latter of which was rebranded to TD Bank.
HHS vs MPB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $39.9M | $62.0M |
| Net Profit | $2.2M | $19.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.3% | 43.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.5% | 31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -15.4% | 30.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 47.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.30 | $0.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $39.9M | $62.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | $61.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.6M | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.6M | $47.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.1M | $47.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.6M | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.0M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.4M | $42.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3M | $18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-335.0K | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-392.0K | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.0K | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-27.8M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-171.0K | $12.1M |
| Q4 25 | -0.3% | 43.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 39.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | 35.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.3% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 32.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 34.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.8% | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.9% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 28.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -61.8% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.4% | 28.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.30 | $0.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.31 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $0.71 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.31 | $0.72 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $0.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.84 | $0.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.02 | $0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $20.5M | $814.1M |
| Total Assets | $91.8M | $6.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $20.5M | $814.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9M | $796.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.2M | $775.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.4M | $667.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | $655.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.0M | $573.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.6M | $559.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | $551.0M |
| Q4 25 | $91.8M | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $92.7M | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.0M | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.6M | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.8M | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $108.1M | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.7M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $113.4M | $5.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $737.0K | $80.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-686.0K | $71.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.7% | 115.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 13.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.33× | 4.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-4.5M | $132.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $737.0K | $80.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.8M | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-818.0K | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0M | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.7M | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-686.0K | $71.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.1M | $27.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-923.0K | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.9M | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $926.0K | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.2M | $12.1M |
| Q4 25 | -1.7% | 115.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.5% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.1% | 50.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.2% | 18.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | 93.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.2% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 40.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.7% | 28.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | 4.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.76× | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HHS
| Fulfillment And Logistics Services | $17.3M | 43% |
| Customer Care | $13.7M | 34% |
| Other | $8.9M | 22% |
MPB
Segment breakdown not available.
