vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) and PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC (PB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hillenbrand, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($550.2M vs $367.6M, roughly 1.5× PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC). PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 31.6% vs -0.4%, a 32.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC's revenue compounded faster (19.2% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Hillenbrand, Inc. is a global diversified industrial firm that designs, manufactures, and distributes specialized processing equipment and durable industrial solutions. It serves food & beverage, agriculture, manufacturing, waste management sectors, with operations across North America, Europe, and APAC.
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Houston, Texas with operations in Texas and central Oklahoma. As of December 31, 2019, the company operated 285 branches: 65 in the Houston area, including The Woodlands, Texas; 30 in South Texas, including Corpus Christi, Texas and Victoria, Texas; 75 in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex; 22 in East Texas; 29 in Central Texas, including Austin, Texas and San Antonio; 34 in West Texas, including Lubbock, Texas, Midland–Odess...
HI vs PB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $550.2M | $367.6M |
| Net Profit | $-2.2M | $116.3M |
| Gross Margin | 33.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -2.2% | — |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | 31.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -22.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -134.4% | -10.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $367.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $550.2M | $275.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $652.1M | $273.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $598.9M | $267.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $715.9M | $265.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $706.9M | $267.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $837.6M | $261.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $786.6M | $258.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $116.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.2M | $139.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.7M | $137.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $135.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-40.9M | $130.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4M | $130.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.6M | $127.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-248.9M | $111.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.2% | 65.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 64.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.2% | 62.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 62.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 62.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.7% | 55.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 50.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 50.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 50.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.7% | 49.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 48.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -31.6% | 43.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.16 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.07 | $1.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $1.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.58 | $1.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | $1.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $1.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.53 | $1.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $173.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $8.2B |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $43.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $173.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $162.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $458.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $7.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $43.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $38.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $38.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $38.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $38.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $39.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $40.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $39.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.48× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-27.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-31.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-27.4M | $78.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.7M | $194.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $98.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $178.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.3M | $-205.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.5M | $274.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.6M | $216.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-31.6M | $68.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.6M | $185.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.2M | $91.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.0M | $171.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.5M | $-210.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.4M | $270.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | $211.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.7% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.1% | 64.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.0% | -78.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.3% | 103.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 81.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 1.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.89× | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.79× | 0.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.77× | -1.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.40× | 2.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.94× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HI
| Transferred At Point In Time | $256.5M | 47% |
| Transferred Over Time | $207.1M | 38% |
| Molding Technology Solutions | $86.6M | 16% |
PB
| Net Interest Income | $321.1M | 87% |
| Noninterest Income | $46.5M | 13% |
