vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hims & Hers Health, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($617.8M vs $425.3M, roughly 1.5× Verisign). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 3.3%, a 45.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hims & Hers Health, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.4% vs 7.6%). Verisign produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.1M vs $-2.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (49.0% CAGR vs 5.2%).
Hims & Hers Health, Inc. is an American telehealth company established in 2017. The company provides prescription medications, over-the-counter medications, and personal care products.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
HIMS vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $617.8M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $20.6M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | 71.9% | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 3.3% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.4% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -20.8% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.08 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $617.8M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $599.0M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $544.8M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $586.0M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.1M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $401.6M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $315.6M | $387.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $278.2M | $384.3M |
| Q4 25 | $20.6M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.8M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.5M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.0M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.6M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3M | $198.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.1M | $194.1M |
| Q4 25 | 71.9% | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 73.8% | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.4% | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 73.5% | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 76.8% | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 79.2% | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.3% | 87.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 82.4% | 87.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | 67.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 50.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $228.6M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $540.9M | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $228.6M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $345.8M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.7M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $220.6M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.5M | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $129.3M | $689.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $105.2M | $924.7M |
| Q4 25 | $540.9M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $581.0M | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $562.7M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $549.3M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $476.7M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $440.1M | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.0M | $-1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $344.5M | $-1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $891.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $707.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $602.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $480.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $448.1M | $1.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $61.3M | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.5M | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.4% | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.3% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.98× | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $57.4M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $61.3M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.7M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.1M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.1M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.4M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.3M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.6M | $160.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.8M | $257.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.5M | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.3M | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-69.5M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.1M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.5M | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.4M | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.6M | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.8M | $253.5M |
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.8% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.3% | 66.0% |
| Q4 25 | 10.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.98× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.43× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.45× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.20× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.32× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.13× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.03× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.32× | 1.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
