vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Vyome Holdings, Inc (HIND) and SAFE & GREEN HOLDINGS CORP. (OLOX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SAFE & GREEN HOLDINGS CORP. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8M vs $1.2M, roughly 1.4× Vyome Holdings, Inc). Vyome Holdings, Inc runs the higher net margin — -211.8% vs -212.0%, a 0.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vyome Holdings, Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-36.8% vs -55.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Vyome Holdings, Inc's revenue compounded faster (-24.1% CAGR vs -34.8%).
Vyome Holdings, IncHINDEarnings & Financial Report
Vyome Holdings, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing innovative therapeutic solutions for a range of dermatological conditions. Its product pipeline targets unmet medical needs related to acne, atopic dermatitis, and chronic fungal infections, with primary operations and market presence across North America and South Asia.
Safe Auto Insurance Company is an American property and casualty auto insurance carrier. It is a privately held carrier and provider of state-minimum private-passenger auto insurance for drivers in the nonstandard insurance market in 20 states across the US, including Oregon, Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky, Georgia, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Louisiana, Mississippi, Illinois, Missouri, Arizona, Oklahoma, Kansas, Virginia, Texas, California, Alabama, and Colorado.
HIND vs OLOX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2M | $1.8M |
| Net Profit | $-2.6M | $-3.7M |
| Gross Margin | 48.2% | -7.2% |
| Operating Margin | -222.4% | -127.8% |
| Net Margin | -211.8% | -212.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -36.8% | -55.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -64.9% | -3.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.25 | $-113.82 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $2.0M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | $2.2M | $4.0M |
| Q2 25 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-547.8K | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-1.7M | $-13.6M | ||
| Q3 23 | $-3.5M | $-3.6M |
| Q2 25 | 48.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -118.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | -7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.7% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.9% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 92.9% | -101.4% | ||
| Q3 23 | 59.8% | -13.5% |
| Q2 25 | -222.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -198.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.3% | -127.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -104.5% | -150.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -113.7% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -95.7% | -536.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | -180.0% | -60.3% |
| Q2 25 | -211.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 132.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 160.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -23.9% | -212.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -81.2% | -373.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -112.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -85.7% | -695.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | -164.0% | -91.0% |
| Q2 25 | $-2.25 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.98 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4355.36 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1419.10 | $-113.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-91.56 | $-3.31 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-135.37 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-48.87 | $-21.35 | ||
| Q3 23 | $-59.36 | $-0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $257.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $6.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-5.0M | $-8.2M |
| Total Assets | — | $9.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.9K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $743.0K | $257.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0K | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $4.5M | $14.2K | ||
| Q3 23 | $1.4M | $712.9K |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | $-5.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.0M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-6.2M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q3 23 | $3.1M | $5.5M |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-614.0K | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $10.7M | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 23 | $7.8M | $25.3M |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
