vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) and Porch Group, Inc. (PRCH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Porch Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($121.1M vs $120.4M, roughly 1.0× Hippo Holdings Inc.). Hippo Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -3.9%, a 8.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Porch Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (100.0% vs 18.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Porch Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (26.4% CAGR vs 18.9%).
Hippo Valley Estate is a sugar estate found near the town of Chiredzi in Chiredzi District of southeastern Zimbabwe, on the Runde River near the border with Mozambique.
Porch is a website that tries to connect homeowners with local home improvement contractors. The site features advice articles, cost guide, and online booking for over 160 home projects.
HIPO vs PRCH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $120.4M | $121.1M |
| Net Profit | $6.0M | $-4.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 34.7% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | -3.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.2% | 100.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -86.4% | 2.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $-0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $121.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $120.4M | $112.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.6M | $115.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.3M | $107.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $110.3M | $84.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.9M | $75.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $95.5M | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.6M | $75.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.1M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-47.7M | $8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.2M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.5M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-40.5M | $-64.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 99.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 75.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 70.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 79.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -41.3% | -1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.3% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.4% | -3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -40.7% | -69.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | -3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.3% | -9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.4% | 40.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.9% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.2% | -84.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.31 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.77 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.91 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.81 | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.34 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.64 | $-0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $218.3M | $68.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $391.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $436.1M | $26.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $806.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 14.87× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $68.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $218.3M | $57.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.7M | $85.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $198.9M | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $140.9M | $70.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.6M | $191.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.2M | $238.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.9M | $308.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $391.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $392.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $387.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $394.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $409.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $403.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $399.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $436.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $26.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $436.1M | $-24.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $421.5M | $-27.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.5M | $-29.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $322.8M | $-52.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.1M | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $326.4M | $-77.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $322.6M | $-101.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $806.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $797.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $787.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $770.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $802.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $814.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $867.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $876.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.87× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.53× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.9M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $35.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.6M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.5M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.8M | $12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.6M | $-26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.8M | $40.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.6M | $35.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.7M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.2M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.7M | $-26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.9% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.0% | 33.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.4% | -13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.3% | -35.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.9% | -34.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.00× | 13.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.07× | -0.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
