vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($220.8M vs $120.4M, roughly 1.8× Hippo Holdings Inc.). UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs 5.0%, a 0.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hippo Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs 9.6%). Hippo Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.1M vs $-19.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Hippo Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (18.9% CAGR vs 9.5%).
Hippo Valley Estate is a sugar estate found near the town of Chiredzi in Chiredzi District of southeastern Zimbabwe, on the Runde River near the border with Mozambique.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
HIPO vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $120.4M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | $6.0M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.2% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -86.4% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $120.4M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.6M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.3M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $110.3M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.9M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $95.5M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.6M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.1M | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.1M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-47.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.2M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.5M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-40.5M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-35.7M | $7.8M |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -41.3% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.3% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -40.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -38.7% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.3% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.4% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -42.0% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.31 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.77 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.91 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.81 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.34 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.64 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.47 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $218.3M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $436.1M | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $218.3M | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.7M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $198.9M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $140.9M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.6M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.2M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.9M | $115.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $223.4M | $116.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $137.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $141.9M |
| Q4 25 | $436.1M | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $421.5M | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.5M | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $322.8M | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.1M | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $326.4M | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $322.6M | $239.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $351.2M | $232.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $706.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $702.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.61× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.2M | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.1M | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.53× | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.8M | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.9M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.6M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.5M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.8M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.6M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.7M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | $9.1M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.8M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.6M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.7M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.2M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.7M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.9% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.4% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.3% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.7% | -4.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.53× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.00× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.07× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HIPO
Segment breakdown not available.
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |
