vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of High Tide Inc. (HITI) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
High Tide Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.5M vs $100.0M, roughly 1.4× Latham Group, Inc.). High Tide Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1.9% vs -7.0%, a 5.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
High Tide Inc. is a Canada-based consumer retail and lifestyle company focused on the global cannabis sector. It operates a large network of licensed cannabis dispensaries across North America, sells cannabis consumption accessories and branded cannabis products, and runs multiple leading e-commerce platforms catering to recreational and medical cannabis users.
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
HITI vs SWIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $142.5M | $100.0M |
| Net Profit | $-2.7M | $-7.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | -10.7% |
| Net Margin | -1.9% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 76.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $142.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.7M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.3M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $111.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $128.1M | $87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $150.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $160.1M |
| Q1 26 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $991.0K | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.0K | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.9% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.4% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.1% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.1% |
| Q1 26 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.5% |
| Q1 26 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $279.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $405.9M |
| Total Assets | — | $823.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $281.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $306.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $282.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $405.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $408.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $398.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $381.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $387.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $416.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $408.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $823.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $822.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $824.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $794.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $853.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $830.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.69× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 14.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 9.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $38.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $52.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-50.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-98.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HITI
Segment breakdown not available.
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |
