vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (HIVE) and SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. (SWBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($124.7M vs $93.1M, roughly 1.3× HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd.). SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 1.5% vs -98.1%, a 99.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (218.6% vs -3.9%). Over the past eight quarters, HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (102.2% CAGR vs -4.8%).
Mastech Digital, Inc. is a digital transformation and information technology (IT) services company headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, providing services to corporations across North America, Middle East, Asian, and Japan.
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
HIVE vs SWBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $93.1M | $124.7M |
| Net Profit | $-91.3M | $1.9M |
| Gross Margin | -27.1% | 24.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 3.3% |
| Net Margin | -98.1% | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 218.6% | -3.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -234.0% | -53.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.38 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $93.1M | $124.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.3M | $85.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.6M | $140.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $115.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.2M | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.6M | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.2M | $159.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $137.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-91.3M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.8M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.0M | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.2M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.0K | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.3M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.9M |
| Q4 25 | -27.1% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.6% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -43.7% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -66.1% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.4% | 35.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.2% |
| Q4 25 | -98.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.1% | -4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 233.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.7% | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.38 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.52 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.17 | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $22.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $559.3M | $363.2M |
| Total Assets | $624.0M | $548.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $26.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.5M | $39.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.7M | $35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $60.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $47.4M |
| Q4 25 | $559.3M | $363.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $624.6M | $364.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $560.5M | $372.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $366.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $430.9M | $371.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.5M | $380.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $268.6M | $399.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $376.4M |
| Q4 25 | $624.0M | $548.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $693.0M | $554.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.7M | $559.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $578.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $478.6M | $587.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $334.7M | $571.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $577.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $570.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $46.0M | $27.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $16.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 14.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $21.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $46.0M | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.6M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $40.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-28.5M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $-30.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | $43.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-16.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-55.5M | $-10.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.7M | $-35.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -189.9% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -153.4% | -40.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 92.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 143.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.29× | 4.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.68× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.42× | -1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.94× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
