vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC. (HIW) and Zai Lab Ltd (ZLAB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($203.4M vs $127.1M, roughly 1.6× Zai Lab Ltd). On growth, Zai Lab Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.1% vs -1.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Zai Lab Ltd's revenue compounded faster (20.8% CAGR vs -1.9%).

Highwoods Properties, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that owns, develops, acquires, and manages high-quality office properties primarily located in fast-growing metropolitan areas across the Southeastern and Mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. Its client base includes corporate tenants across diverse industry segments such as technology, healthcare, finance, and professional services.

Zai Lab Ltd is a global biopharmaceutical company focused on developing, manufacturing and commercializing innovative therapies for oncology, autoimmune disorders, infectious diseases and other unmet medical needs. It operates primarily in the Greater China region and partners with leading global biotech firms to expand access to life-saving treatments for underserved patient populations.

HIW vs ZLAB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
HIW
HIW
1.6× larger
HIW
$203.4M
$127.1M
ZLAB
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ZLAB
ZLAB
+18.2% gap
ZLAB
17.1%
-1.1%
HIW
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ZLAB
ZLAB
Annualised
ZLAB
20.8%
-1.9%
HIW

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
HIW
HIW
ZLAB
ZLAB
Revenue
$203.4M
$127.1M
Net Profit
$29.7M
Gross Margin
51.0%
Operating Margin
67.2%
-54.6%
Net Margin
14.6%
Revenue YoY
-1.1%
17.1%
Net Profit YoY
1029.4%
EPS (diluted)
$0.25
$-0.05

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
HIW
HIW
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q4 25
$203.4M
$127.1M
Q3 25
$201.8M
$115.4M
Q2 25
$200.6M
$109.1M
Q1 25
$200.4M
$105.7M
Q4 24
$205.5M
$108.5M
Q3 24
$204.3M
$101.8M
Q2 24
$204.7M
$100.1M
Q1 24
$211.3M
$87.1M
Net Profit
HIW
HIW
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q4 25
$29.7M
Q3 25
$13.7M
$-36.0M
Q2 25
$19.2M
$-40.7M
Q1 25
$100.0M
$-48.4M
Q4 24
$-3.2M
Q3 24
$15.5M
$-41.7M
Q2 24
$64.8M
$-80.3M
Q1 24
$27.2M
$-53.5M
Gross Margin
HIW
HIW
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q4 25
51.0%
Q3 25
59.5%
Q2 25
60.6%
Q1 25
63.6%
Q4 24
61.5%
Q3 24
64.1%
Q2 24
64.9%
Q1 24
61.4%
Operating Margin
HIW
HIW
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q4 25
67.2%
-54.6%
Q3 25
67.3%
-42.3%
Q2 25
68.3%
-50.3%
Q1 25
67.5%
-53.3%
Q4 24
65.2%
-62.6%
Q3 24
67.8%
-66.6%
Q2 24
68.5%
-76.0%
Q1 24
66.7%
-80.7%
Net Margin
HIW
HIW
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q4 25
14.6%
Q3 25
6.8%
-31.2%
Q2 25
9.6%
-37.3%
Q1 25
49.9%
-45.8%
Q4 24
-1.6%
Q3 24
7.6%
-40.9%
Q2 24
31.6%
-80.2%
Q1 24
12.9%
-61.4%
EPS (diluted)
HIW
HIW
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q4 25
$0.25
$-0.05
Q3 25
$0.12
$-0.03
Q2 25
$0.17
$-0.04
Q1 25
$0.91
$-0.04
Q4 24
$-0.04
$-0.09
Q3 24
$0.14
$-0.04
Q2 24
$0.59
$-0.08
Q1 24
$0.25
$-0.05

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
HIW
HIW
ZLAB
ZLAB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$27.4M
$689.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.4B
$715.5M
Total Assets
$6.3B
$1.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
HIW
HIW
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q4 25
$27.4M
$689.6M
Q3 25
$26.3M
$717.2M
Q2 25
$21.2M
$732.2M
Q1 25
$20.1M
$757.3M
Q4 24
$22.4M
$779.7M
Q3 24
$23.6M
$616.1M
Q2 24
$27.0M
$630.0M
Q1 24
$16.4M
$650.8M
Stockholders' Equity
HIW
HIW
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q4 25
$2.4B
$715.5M
Q3 25
$2.4B
$759.9M
Q2 25
$2.4B
$791.7M
Q1 25
$2.4B
$810.8M
Q4 24
$2.4B
$840.9M
Q3 24
$2.4B
$667.7M
Q2 24
$2.4B
$704.2M
Q1 24
$2.4B
$762.2M
Total Assets
HIW
HIW
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q4 25
$6.3B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$6.1B
$1.2B
Q2 25
$6.1B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$6.1B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$6.0B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$6.0B
$985.3M
Q2 24
$6.0B
$987.4M
Q1 24
$6.0B
$988.4M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
HIW
HIW
ZLAB
ZLAB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$359.2M
$-26.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-26.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-21.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
12.09×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-158.9M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
HIW
HIW
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q4 25
$359.2M
$-26.0M
Q3 25
$96.7M
$-32.0M
Q2 25
$116.5M
$-31.0M
Q1 25
$46.3M
$-61.7M
Q4 24
$403.6M
$-55.8M
Q3 24
$97.5M
$-26.8M
Q2 24
$130.0M
$-42.2M
Q1 24
$72.4M
$-90.1M
Free Cash Flow
HIW
HIW
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q4 25
$-26.7M
Q3 25
$-35.0M
Q2 25
$-33.9M
Q1 25
$-63.2M
Q4 24
$-58.4M
Q3 24
$-28.2M
Q2 24
$-42.9M
Q1 24
$-91.1M
FCF Margin
HIW
HIW
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q4 25
-21.0%
Q3 25
-30.4%
Q2 25
-31.1%
Q1 25
-59.9%
Q4 24
-53.8%
Q3 24
-27.7%
Q2 24
-42.9%
Q1 24
-104.5%
Capex Intensity
HIW
HIW
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q4 25
0.5%
Q3 25
2.6%
Q2 25
2.6%
Q1 25
1.5%
Q4 24
2.4%
Q3 24
1.3%
Q2 24
0.7%
Q1 24
1.1%
Cash Conversion
HIW
HIW
ZLAB
ZLAB
Q4 25
12.09×
Q3 25
7.05×
Q2 25
6.06×
Q1 25
0.46×
Q4 24
Q3 24
6.30×
Q2 24
2.01×
Q1 24
2.66×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

HIW
HIW

Raleigh NC$45.6M22%
Nashville TN$38.7M19%
Atlanta GA$36.1M18%
Charlotte NC$26.1M13%
Tampa FL$22.2M11%
Orlando FL$14.4M7%
Other$11.4M6%
Richmond VA$8.8M4%

ZLAB
ZLAB

Zejula$56.0M44%
Other$21.9M17%
Nuzyra$16.0M13%
Optune$11.9M9%
XACDURO$10.7M8%
Qinlock$9.7M8%
AUGTYRO$836.0K1%

Related Comparisons