vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HiTek Global Inc. (HKIT) and OSR Holdings, Inc. (OSRH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HiTek Global Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($741.5K vs $627.7K, roughly 1.2× OSR Holdings, Inc.). HiTek Global Inc. runs the higher net margin — -123.5% vs -508.9%, a 385.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OSR Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-23.7% vs -59.6%).
DB HiTek Co., Ltd., formerly Dongbu HiTek, is a semiconductor contract manufacturing and design company headquartered in Bucheon, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea. DB HiTek is one of the major contract chip manufacturers, alongside TSMC, Samsung Electronics, GlobalFoundries, and UMC. It is also the second-largest foundry company in South Korea, behind Samsung Electronics.
HKIT vs OSRH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $741.5K | $627.7K |
| Net Profit | $-916.1K | $-3.2M |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | 41.7% |
| Operating Margin | -181.7% | -605.9% |
| Net Margin | -123.5% | -508.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -59.6% | -23.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -853.0% | -1283.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $627.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | $741.5K | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $761.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $823.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $881.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $910.2K | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-916.1K | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-231.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $121.7K | $-97.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-60.4K | ||
| Q2 23 | $622.0K | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 41.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.0% | 26.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | 50.9% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -605.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -181.7% | -460.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -383.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -433.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.3% | -364.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -362.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | 17.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -508.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -123.5% | -460.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1496.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | 21.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 23 | $0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $29.8M | $2.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $34.6M | $134.2M |
| Total Assets | $41.1M | $177.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.8M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.4M | $119.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.6K | ||
| Q2 23 | $12.2M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $134.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.6M | $139.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $132.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-5.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.1M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $26.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $177.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.1M | $185.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $174.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.5M | $20.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $37.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $33.2M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.2M | $-2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-482.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-64.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-686.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | $754.1K | $-483.2K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-498.8K | ||
| Q2 23 | $200.9K | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $744.3K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $60.3K | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 2.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 4.8% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
