vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hillman Solutions Corp. (HLMN) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hillman Solutions Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($370.1M vs $200.5M, roughly 1.8× ROGERS CORP). ROGERS CORP runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -1.3%, a 3.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ROGERS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.2% vs 3.0%). ROGERS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.1M vs $-34.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Hillman Solutions Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.2% CAGR vs -3.3%).
Hillman Solutions is an American hardware manufacturing, distribution and consumer fabrication services company.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
HLMN vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $370.1M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $-4.7M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | — |
| Net Margin | -1.3% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.0% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $370.1M | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $365.1M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $424.9M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $402.8M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $359.3M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $349.6M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $393.3M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $379.4M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | $-4.7M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.2M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.8M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-317.0K | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.5M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | -1.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.3% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.02 | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.08 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.00 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.7M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $714.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.59× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $27.7M | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.3M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.7M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.2M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.5M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.8M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | $714.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $668.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $683.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $683.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $713.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $691.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $730.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $732.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $2.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.62× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-34.3M | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -9.3% | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $22.1M | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.9M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.2M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.7M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-655.0K | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.1M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.8M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | $-34.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.1M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.2M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.3M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.1M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.5M | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | -9.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | 4.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.33× | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.13× | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.08× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.57× | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.17× | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
