vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hinge Health, Inc. (HNGE) and MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($284.8M vs $182.3M, roughly 1.6× Hinge Health, Inc.). Hinge Health, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 19.3% vs 15.3%, a 3.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hinge Health, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (47.2% vs -29.1%). Hinge Health, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($41.6M vs $-57.2M).
Hinge Health is a leading digital musculoskeletal care solution provider that delivers clinically validated programs combining exercise therapy, pain management, and one-on-one health coaching for employers, health plans, and individual users across North America and Europe, focused on reducing chronic musculoskeletal pain and improving long-term physical health outcomes.
Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions is one of the largest manufacturers of caskets and funerary urns in the United States, selling over 38% of the country's caskets as of 2005. The Aurora, Indiana–based company is a subsidiary of Pittsburgh-based Matthews International. The company makes both wooden and metal caskets and urns for holding cremated remains. It also provides supplies and consulting services for funeral homes.
HNGE vs MATW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.3M | $284.8M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $43.6M |
| Gross Margin | 84.6% | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | 17.6% | 34.2% |
| Net Margin | 19.3% | 15.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 47.2% | -29.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 105.0% | 1356.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.41 | $1.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $284.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $35.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $43.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-575.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | 84.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 81.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -417.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -413.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.41 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.10 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $186.7M | $31.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $529.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $111.7M | $543.2M |
| Total Assets | $728.8M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $186.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $31.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $413.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $529.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $111.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $543.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $208.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $173.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | $728.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $769.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $43.1M | $-52.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.6M | $-57.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.8% | -20.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.23× | -1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $43.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-52.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $41.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-57.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.23× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
