vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HOOKER FURNISHINGS Corp (HOFT) and Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HOOKER FURNISHINGS Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($70.7M vs $51.2M, roughly 1.4× Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.). HOOKER FURNISHINGS Corp runs the higher net margin — -29.9% vs -106.3%, a 76.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HOOKER FURNISHINGS Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.0% vs -1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.4% CAGR vs -22.2%).
Hooker Furnishings Corp is a leading home furnishings manufacturer and marketer, offering residential seating, dining sets, bedroom furniture, home office pieces and custom upholstery. It serves retailers, designers and hospitality clients across North America, focusing on premium craftsmanship and diverse design styles.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
HOFT vs PLYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $70.7M | $51.2M |
| Net Profit | $-21.2M | $-54.4M |
| Gross Margin | 25.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -23.1% | -102.5% |
| Net Margin | -29.9% | -106.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.0% | -1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.0% | -248.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.99 | $-1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $70.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.3M | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.1M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $47.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $95.1M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.6M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $50.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-21.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.3M | $-54.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.3M | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.1M | $147.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.1M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -23.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.4% | -102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.2% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.3% | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -29.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.0% | -106.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.6% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.0% | 309.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.99 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.31 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.29 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.22 | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.39 | $3.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.19 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.39 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $169.8M | $470.1M |
| Total Assets | $240.2M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $821.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $646.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $169.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $193.1M | $470.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.2M | $539.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $204.4M | $571.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.8M | $579.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $215.3M | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $219.6M | $475.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $484.6M |
| Q4 25 | $240.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $278.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $299.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $313.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $332.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $335.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.7M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.7M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.6M | $96.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $634.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HOFT
| Upholstery | $36.7M | 52% |
| Domestic Upholstery | $30.2M | 43% |
| All Other | $4.0M | 6% |
PLYM
Segment breakdown not available.
