vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hologic (HOLX) and RB GLOBAL INC. (RBA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RB GLOBAL INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.2× Hologic). Hologic runs the higher net margin — 17.1% vs 11.0%, a 6.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RB GLOBAL INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.4% vs 2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, RB GLOBAL INC.'s revenue compounded faster (6.1% CAGR vs 1.5%).
Hologic, Inc. is an American medical technology company primarily focused on women's health; it sells medical devices for diagnostics, surgery, and medical imaging.
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), or simply Ritchie Bros., is a publicly traded company legally domiciled in Canada with headquarters in Westchester, Illinois. Its common shares are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange.
HOLX vs RBA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $179.1M | $135.6M |
| Gross Margin | 56.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 22.6% | 17.6% |
| Net Margin | 17.1% | 11.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.5% | 11.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -10.9% | 19.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.79 | $0.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $988.0M | $981.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $135.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $179.1M | $109.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $187.2M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.9M | $109.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.4M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $201.0M | $118.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.6M | $76.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $194.5M | $111.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 56.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 56.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.6% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.7% | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.5% | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.1% | 18.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.7% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 10.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.66 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.79 | $0.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.84 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $0.55 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.87 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.75 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.82 | $0.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.4B | $667.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | $2.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.2B | $5.6B |
| Total Assets | $9.2B | $12.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.48× | 0.45× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $667.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $531.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $674.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $710.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $578.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $533.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $650.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $599.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $5.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $12.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.2B | $12.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0B | $12.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8B | $12.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5B | $11.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7B | $11.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.9B | $12.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.48× | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.55× | 0.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.53× | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.49× | 0.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.51× | 0.55× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $229.9M | $224.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $215.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 20.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.28× | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.0B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $224.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $229.9M | $255.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $355.1M | $239.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $343.3M | $326.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.4M | $156.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $189.3M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $367.0M | $285.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $405.8M | $337.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $215.2M | $186.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $341.4M | $188.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $330.5M | $241.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.9M | $102.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $172.5M | $127.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $350.6M | $248.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $385.3M | $308.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.5% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.5% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.3% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.5% | 25.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.1% | 28.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.28× | 2.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.90× | 2.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.76× | 2.97× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.94× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.09× | 3.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HOLX
| Molecular Diagnostics | $255.3M | 24% |
| Breast Imaging | $219.9M | 21% |
| Services | $216.4M | 21% |
| Capital Equipment Componentsand Software | $187.2M | 18% |
| Cytology Perinatal | $76.0M | 7% |
| Interventional Breast Solutions | $71.2M | 7% |
| Blood Screening | $8.4M | 1% |
| Other Typeof Revenue | $5.4M | 1% |
RBA
| Transactional buyer revenue | $577.5M | 47% |
| Inventory sales revenue | $336.9M | 27% |
| Transactional seller revenue | $241.3M | 20% |
| Marketplace services revenue | $78.9M | 6% |
