vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hoth Therapeutics, Inc. (HOTH) and Alaunos Therapeutics, Inc. (TCRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hoth Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on researching and developing targeted, novel therapies for unmet medical needs across dermatology, autoimmune diseases, and oncology indications. It primarily operates in the U.S. market, advancing multiple pipeline candidates aimed at improving patient outcomes for conditions with limited existing treatment options.
Alaunos Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company that develops novel T cell receptor (TCR) immunotherapies for the treatment of hard-to-treat solid tumors. The firm focuses on advancing precision oncology candidates targeting shared tumor antigens, serving global oncology patient populations via internal R&D and cross-sector partnerships.
HOTH vs TCRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $0 | $3.0K |
| Net Profit | $-2.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | -40.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2.4% | -20.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $1.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.1M | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -54600.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -29150.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.2% | -174200.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -53650.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -28225.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.2% | -168200.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.32 | $-0.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.49 | $-1.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.0M | $1.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.9M | $2.2M |
| Total Assets | $8.7M | $3.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $319.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.0M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6M | $4.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.4M | $4.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1M | $6.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.6M | $-2.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-3.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -98900.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3266.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-844.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-701.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-772.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | $-781.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.7M | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -98900.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 3266.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
